Literature DB >> 21450738

Bell miner provisioning calls are more similar among relatives and are used by helpers at the nest to bias their effort towards kin.

Paul G McDonald1, Jonathan Wright.   

Abstract

Kin selection predicts that helpers in cooperative systems should preferentially aid relatives to maximize fitness. In family-based groups, this can be accomplished simply by assisting all group members. In more complex societies, where large numbers of kin and non-kin regularly interact, more sophisticated kin-recognition mechanisms are needed. Bell miners (Manorina melanophrys) are just such a system where individuals regularly interact with both kin and non-kin within large colonies. Despite this complexity, individual helpers of both sexes facultatively work harder when provisioning the young of closer genetic relatedness. We investigated the mechanism by which such adaptive discrimination occurs by assessing genetic kinship influences on the structure of more than 1900 provisioning vocalizations of 185 miners. These 'mew' calls showed a significant, positive linear increase in call similarity with increasing genetic relatedness, most especially in comparisons between male helpers and the breeding male. Furthermore, individual helping effort was more heavily influenced by call similarity to breeding males than to genetic relatedness, as predicted if call similarity is indeed the rule-of-thumb used to discriminate kin in this system. Individual mew call structure appeared to be inflexible and innate, providing an effective mechanism by which helpers can assess their relatedness to any individual. This provides, to our knowledge, the first example of a mechanism for fine-scale kin discrimination in a complex avian society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21450738      PMCID: PMC3177633          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  17 in total

1.  Relatedness and chick-feeding effort in the cooperatively breeding Arabian babbler.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Experimental evidence that kin discrimination in the Seychelles warbler is based on association and not on genetic relatedness.

Authors:  Jan Komdeur; David S Richardson; Terry Burke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Altruism through beard chromodynamics.

Authors:  Vincent A A Jansen; Minus van Baalen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Greenbeards.

Authors:  Andy Gardner; Stuart A West
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Routes to indirect fitness in cooperatively breeding vertebrates: kin discrimination and limited dispersal.

Authors:  C K Cornwallis; S A West; A S Griffin
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Complex social organization reflects genetic structure and relatedness in the cooperatively breeding bell miner, Manorina melanophrys.

Authors:  J N Painter; R H Crozier; A Poiani; R J Robertson; M F Clarke
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Social evolution: kin preference in a social microbe.

Authors:  Natasha J Mehdiabadi; Chandra N Jack; Tiffany Talley Farnham; Thomas G Platt; Sara E Kalla; Gad Shaulsky; David C Queller; Joan E Strassmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Learned kin recognition cues in a social bird.

Authors:  Stuart P Sharp; Andrew McGowan; Matthew J Wood; Ben J Hatchwell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The genetic basis of zebra finch vocalizations.

Authors:  Wolfgang Forstmeier; Claudia Burger; Katja Temnow; Sébastien Derégnaucourt
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Kin discrimination and the benefit of helping in cooperatively breeding vertebrates.

Authors:  Ashleigh S Griffin; Stuart A West
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  7 in total

1.  Helping decisions and kin recognition in long-tailed tits: is call similarity used to direct help towards kin?

Authors:  Amy E Leedale; Robert F Lachlan; Elva J H Robinson; Ben J Hatchwell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Cooperative bird differentiates between the calls of different individuals, even when vocalizations were from completely unfamiliar individuals.

Authors:  Paul G McDonald
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Multiple social encounters can eliminate Crozier's paradox and stabilise genetic kin recognition.

Authors:  Alan Grafen; Stuart A West; Thomas W Scott
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Pitch- and spectral-based dynamic time warping methods for comparing field recordings of harmonic avian vocalizations.

Authors:  C Daniel Meliza; Sara C Keen; Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Flight calls signal group and individual identity but not kinship in a cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  Sara C Keen; C Daniel Meliza; Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 2.671

6.  Helping in cooperatively breeding long-tailed tits: a test of Hamilton's rule.

Authors:  Ben J Hatchwell; Philippa R Gullett; Mark J Adams
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  The importance of the altricial - precocial spectrum for social complexity in mammals and birds - a review.

Authors:  Isabella B R Scheiber; Brigitte M Weiß; Sjouke A Kingma; Jan Komdeur
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.