Literature DB >> 23927136

Pitch- and spectral-based dynamic time warping methods for comparing field recordings of harmonic avian vocalizations.

C Daniel Meliza1, Sara C Keen, Dustin R Rubenstein.   

Abstract

Quantitative measures of acoustic similarity can reveal patterns of shared vocal behavior in social species. Many methods for computing similarity have been developed, but their performance has not been extensively characterized in noisy environments and with vocalizations characterized by complex frequency modulations. This paper describes methods of bioacoustic comparison based on dynamic time warping (DTW) of the fundamental frequency or spectrogram. Fundamental frequency is estimated using a Bayesian particle filter adaptation of harmonic template matching. The methods were tested on field recordings of flight calls from superb starlings, Lamprotornis superbus, for how well they could separate distinct categories of call elements (motifs). The fundamental-frequency-based method performed best, but the spectrogram-based method was less sensitive to noise. Both DTW methods provided better separation of categories than spectrographic cross correlation, likely due to substantial variability in the duration of superb starling flight call motifs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23927136      PMCID: PMC3745477          DOI: 10.1121/1.4812269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  Semi-automatic classification of bird vocalizations using spectral peak tracks.

Authors:  Zhixin Chen; Robert C Maher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Female extrapair mate choice in a cooperative breeder: trading sex for help and increasing offspring heterozygosity.

Authors:  Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Call divergence is correlated with geographic and genetic distance in greenish warblers (Phylloscopus trochiloides): a strong role for stochasticity in signal evolution?

Authors:  D E Irwin; M P Thimgan; J H Irwin
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Spectrogram denoising and automated extraction of the fundamental frequency variation of dolphin whistles.

Authors:  Asitha Mallawaarachchi; S H Ong; Mandar Chitre; Elizabeth Taylor
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Vocal imitation and individual recognition of finch calls.

Authors:  P C Mundinger
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-04-24       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Role of syringeal muscles in controlling the phonology of bird song.

Authors:  F Goller; R A Suthers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Categorical perception of a natural stimulus continuum: birdsong.

Authors:  D A Nelson; P Marler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Quantifying complex patterns of bioacoustic variation: use of a neural network to compare killer whale (Orcinus orca) dialects.

Authors:  V B Deecke; J K Ford; P Spong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Template-based automatic recognition of birdsong syllables from continuous recordings.

Authors:  S E Anderson; A S Dave; D Margoliash
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Bell miner provisioning calls are more similar among relatives and are used by helpers at the nest to bias their effort towards kin.

Authors:  Paul G McDonald; Jonathan Wright
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  2 in total

1.  Finding, visualizing, and quantifying latent structure across diverse animal vocal repertoires.

Authors:  Tim Sainburg; Marvin Thielk; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Flight calls signal group and individual identity but not kinship in a cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  Sara C Keen; C Daniel Meliza; Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 2.671

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.