Literature DB >> 19780812

Greenbeards.

Andy Gardner1, Stuart A West.   

Abstract

Greenbeards are genes that can identify the presence of copies of themselves in other individuals, and cause their bearer to behave nepotistically toward those individuals. In recent years, a number of examples have been discovered, and it has been suggested that greenbeards represent one of the fundamental routes to social behaviors such as cooperation. However, despite their possible theoretical and empirical importance, many basic aspects of greenbeard biology are commonly misunderstood. Here, we distinguish between four different types of greenbeard, which differ in their evolutionary dynamics. We show that all four types exist, and that they differ in the ease with which they can be empirically detected. We clarify the inclusive fitness explanation of greenbeards, and show that they are not intragenomic outlaws. Finally, we argue that although greenbeards are likely to be most common and easiest to detect in microorganisms, they are unlikely to important in organisms such as humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19780812     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00842.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  82 in total

1.  A cooperative virulence plasmid imposes a high fitness cost under conditions that induce pathogenesis.

Authors:  Thomas G Platt; James D Bever; Clay Fuqua
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Fitness consequences of plants growing with siblings: reconciling kin selection, niche partitioning and competitive ability.

Authors:  Amanda L File; Guillermo P Murphy; Susan A Dudley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The recognition signal hypothesis for the adaptive evolution of religion : a phylogenetic test with Christian denominations.

Authors:  Luke J Matthews
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-06

Review 4.  The sociobiology of sex: inclusive fitness consequences of inter-sexual interactions.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Selective pressures for accurate altruism targeting: evidence from digital evolution for difficult-to-test aspects of inclusive fitness theory.

Authors:  Jeff Clune; Heather J Goldsby; Charles Ofria; Robert T Pennock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  What traits are carried on mobile genetic elements, and why?

Authors:  D J Rankin; E P C Rocha; S P Brown
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 7.  Correlated pay-offs are key to cooperation.

Authors:  Michael Taborsky; Joachim G Frommen; Christina Riehl
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  Models of social evolution: can we do better to predict 'who helps whom to achieve what'?

Authors:  António M M Rodrigues; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Evolutionary dynamics of n-player games played by relatives.

Authors:  Hisashi Ohtsuki
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Sperm should evolve to make female meiosis fair.

Authors:  Yaniv Brandvain; Graham Coop
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.