Literature DB >> 22258445

Cooperative bird differentiates between the calls of different individuals, even when vocalizations were from completely unfamiliar individuals.

Paul G McDonald1.   

Abstract

Hypotheses proposed to explain the evolution of cooperative behaviour typically require differentiation between either groups of conspecifics (e.g. kin/non-kin) or, more typically, individuals (e.g. reciprocal altruism). Despite this, the mechanisms that facilitate individual or class recognition have rarely been explored in cooperative species. This study examines the individual differentiation abilities of noisy miners (Manorina melanocephala), a species with one of the most complex avian societies known. Miners permanently occupy colonies numbering into hundreds of individuals. Within these colonies, cooperative coalitions form on a fission-fusion basis across numerous contexts, from social foraging through to mobbing predators. Birds often use individually distinctive 'chur' calls to recruit others to a caller's location, facilitating coalition formation. I used the habituation-discrimination paradigm to test the ability of miners to differentiate between the chur calls of two individuals that were both either: (i) familiar, or (ii) unfamiliar to the focal subject. This technique had not, to my knowledge, been used to assess vocalization differentiation in cooperative birds previously, but here demonstrated that miners could correctly use the spectral features of signals to differentiate between the vocalizations of different individuals, regardless of their familiarity. By attending to individual differences in recruitment calls, miners have a communication system that is capable of accommodating even the most complex cooperative hypotheses based upon acoustic information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22258445      PMCID: PMC3367754          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.1118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  7 in total

Review 1.  Breeding together: kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates.

Authors:  Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Evolution of contingent altruism when cooperation is expensive.

Authors:  Ross A Hammond; Robert Axelrod
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 1.570

Review 3.  Individual recognition: it is good to be different.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Tibbetts; James Dale
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Routes to indirect fitness in cooperatively breeding vertebrates: kin discrimination and limited dispersal.

Authors:  C K Cornwallis; S A West; A S Griffin
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Helping effort increases with relatedness in bell miners, but 'unrelated' helpers of both sexes still provide substantial care.

Authors:  Jonathan Wright; Paul G McDonald; Luc te Marvelde; Anahita J N Kazem; Charles M Bishop
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Bell miner provisioning calls are more similar among relatives and are used by helpers at the nest to bias their effort towards kin.

Authors:  Paul G McDonald; Jonathan Wright
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Reliability and the adaptive utility of discrimination among alarm callers.

Authors:  Daniel T Blumstein; Laure Verneyre; Janice C Daniel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Flight calls signal group and individual identity but not kinship in a cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  Sara C Keen; C Daniel Meliza; Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 2.671

2.  Nestlings reduce their predation risk by attending to predator-information encoded within conspecific alarm calls.

Authors:  Ahmad Barati; Paul G McDonald
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Individual vocal recognition across taxa: a review of the literature and a look into the future.

Authors:  Nora V Carlson; E McKenna Kelly; Iain Couzin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Can Nocturnal Flight Calls of the Migrating Songbird, American Redstart, Encode Sexual Dimorphism and Individual Identity?

Authors:  Emily T Griffiths; Sara C Keen; Michael Lanzone; Andrew Farnsworth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.