Literature DB >> 9989958

Early contrast-enhanced MRI predicts late functional recovery after reperfused myocardial infarction.

W J Rogers1, C M Kramer, G Geskin, Y L Hu, T M Theobald, D A Vido, S Petruolo, N Reichek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We have observed 3 abnormal patterns on contrast-enhanced MRI early after reperfused myocardial infarction (MI): (1) absence of normal first-pass signal enhancement (HYPO), (2) normal first pass signal followed by hyperenhanced signal on delayed images (HYPER), or (3) both absence of normal first-pass enhancement and delayed hyperenhancement (COMB). This study examines the association between these patterns in the first week after MI and late recovery of myocardial contractile function by use of magnetic resonance myocardial tissue tagging. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Seventeen patients (14 men) with a mean age of 53+/-12 years were studied after a reperfused first MI. Contrast-enhanced images were acquired immediately after bolus administration of gadolinium and 7+/-2 minutes later. Tagged images were acquired at weeks 1 and 7. Circumferential segment shortening (%S) was measured in regions displaying HYPER, COMB, or HYPO contrast patterns and in remote regions (REMOTE) at weeks 1 and 7. At week 1, %S was depressed in HYPER, COMB, and HYPO (9+/-8%, 7+/-6%, and 5+/-4%, respectively) and were less than REMOTE (18+/-6%, P<0.003). However, in HYPER, %S improved at week 7 from 9+/-8% to 18+/-5% (P<0.001 versus week 1). In contrast, HYPO did not improve significantly (5+/-4% to 6+/-3%, P=NS) and COMB tended to improve 7+/-6% to 11+/-6% (P=0.06).
CONCLUSIONS: HYPER has partially reversible dysfunction and represents predominantly viable myocardium. COMB shows borderline improvement and likely contains an admixture of viable and necrotic myocardium. HYPO shows little functional improvement at 7 weeks, presumably because of irreversible myocardial damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9989958     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.99.6.744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  66 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac MRI for assessment of myocardial perfusion: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  T Laddis; W J Manning; P G Danias
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  The use of Gd-DTPA as a marker of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R S Pereira; F S Prato; G Wisenberg; J Sykes; K J Yvorchuk
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Contrast agents and cardiac MR imaging of myocardial ischemia: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Pierre Croisille; Didier Revel; Maythem Saeed
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  MR of acquired heart disease: ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  A E Stillman
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Relationship and prognostic value of microvascular obstruction and infarct size in ST-elevation myocardial infarction as visualized by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Suzanne de Waha; Steffen Desch; Ingo Eitel; Georg Fuernau; Philipp Lurz; Anja Leuschner; Matthias Grothoff; Matthias Gutberlet; Gerhard Schuler; Holger Thiele
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Single breath-hold slice-following CSPAMM myocardial tagging.

Authors:  M Stuber; M A Spiegel; S E Fischer; M B Scheidegger; P G Danias; E M Pedersen; P Boesiger
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Head to head comparison of quantitative versus visual analysis of contrast CMR in the setting of myocardial stunning after STEMI: implications on late systolic function and patient outcome.

Authors:  Oliver Husser; Vicente Bodi; Juan Sanchis; Julio Nunez; Luis Mainar; Pilar Merlos; Maria P Lopez-Lereu; Jose V Monmeneu; Fabian Chaustre; Eva Rumiz; Günter A J Riegger; Francisco J Chorro; Angel Llacer
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 10.  Post myocardial infarction of the left ventricle: the course ahead seen by cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Pier Giorgio Masci; Jan Bogaert
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.