BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI demonstrates a pattern of hypoenhancement early after contrast injection in acute myocardial infarction (MI) and a pattern of hyperenhancement late after contrast injection. Because the significance of these CE patterns for myocardial viability remains debated, we evaluated their diagnostic accuracy to quantitatively predict late functional improvement of regional contractility. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent CE and tagged MRI at 4 days and again at 7 months after acute MI. Resting circumferential shortening strain (Ecc) was analyzed in 24 segments per patient, and its improvement was correlated with the presence or absence of the CE patterns. Immediately after MI, 389 segments were considered dysfunctional because of having less than mean+/-2 SD Ecc of the remote region (-18+/-4%). At follow-up, significant improvement of Ecc occurred in 170 dysfunctional segments with normal CE (from -4+/-7% to -12+/-7%, P<0.001) but not in 60 segments with early hypoenhancement (from -2+/-6% to -6+/-9% Ecc, P=NS). In 240 dysfunctional segments with delayed hyperenhancement, the improvement of Ecc (from -2+/-6% to -5+/-8%, P<0.001) decreased with increasing transmural extent of hyperenhancement. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that absence of delayed hyperenhancement, compared with absence of early hypoenhancement, had better sensitivity (82% versus 19%, respectively; P<0.001) and accuracy (74% versus 49%, respectively; P<0.001) in predicting recovery of Ecc to any given level. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with lack of early hypoenhancement, lack of delayed hyperenhancement has better diagnostic accuracy in predicting functional improvement in dysfunctional segments. The early hypoenhanced regions, which represent only the fraction of infarcted tissue with concomitant microvascular obstruction, greatly underestimate the amount of irreversibly injured myocardium present after acute MI.
BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI demonstrates a pattern of hypoenhancement early after contrast injection in acute myocardial infarction (MI) and a pattern of hyperenhancement late after contrast injection. Because the significance of these CE patterns for myocardial viability remains debated, we evaluated their diagnostic accuracy to quantitatively predict late functional improvement of regional contractility. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent CE and tagged MRI at 4 days and again at 7 months after acute MI. Resting circumferential shortening strain (Ecc) was analyzed in 24 segments per patient, and its improvement was correlated with the presence or absence of the CE patterns. Immediately after MI, 389 segments were considered dysfunctional because of having less than mean+/-2 SD Ecc of the remote region (-18+/-4%). At follow-up, significant improvement of Ecc occurred in 170 dysfunctional segments with normal CE (from -4+/-7% to -12+/-7%, P<0.001) but not in 60 segments with early hypoenhancement (from -2+/-6% to -6+/-9% Ecc, P=NS). In 240 dysfunctional segments with delayed hyperenhancement, the improvement of Ecc (from -2+/-6% to -5+/-8%, P<0.001) decreased with increasing transmural extent of hyperenhancement. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that absence of delayed hyperenhancement, compared with absence of early hypoenhancement, had better sensitivity (82% versus 19%, respectively; P<0.001) and accuracy (74% versus 49%, respectively; P<0.001) in predicting recovery of Ecc to any given level. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with lack of early hypoenhancement, lack of delayed hyperenhancement has better diagnostic accuracy in predicting functional improvement in dysfunctional segments. The early hypoenhanced regions, which represent only the fraction of infarcted tissue with concomitant microvascular obstruction, greatly underestimate the amount of irreversibly injured myocardium present after acute MI.
Authors: Oliver Husser; Vicente Bodi; Juan Sanchis; Julio Nunez; Luis Mainar; Pilar Merlos; Maria P Lopez-Lereu; Jose V Monmeneu; Fabian Chaustre; Eva Rumiz; Günter A J Riegger; Francisco J Chorro; Angel Llacer Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-02-20 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: H Bülow; C Klein; I Kuehn; R Hollweck; S G Nekolla; K Schreiber; F Haas; J Böhm; B Schnackenburg; R Lange; M Schwaiger Journal: Heart Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Kevin Steel; Ryan Broderick; Vijay Gandla; Eric Larose; Frederick Resnic; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Kenneth A Brown; Raymond Y Kwong Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-09-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Balázs Ruzsics; Pál Surányi; Pál Kiss; Brigitta C Brott; Silvio Litovsky; Thomas S Denney; Inmaculada Aban; Steven G Lloyd; Tamas Simor; Gabriel A Elgavish; Himanshu Gupta Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 2.357