Literature DB >> 17605650

Percutaneous coronary intervention and the no-reflow phenomenon.

William J van Gaal1, Adrian P Banning.   

Abstract

No-reflow during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is observed most commonly during saphenous vein graft intervention, rotational atherectomy and primary PCI for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The contributions of distal embolization and ischemia/reperfusion injury to the pathogenesis of no-reflow vary in these settings, as does prevention and management. Prevention of no-reflow in these high-risk groups is the best treatment strategy, employing antiplatelet agents, vasodilators and/or mechanical devices to prevent distal embolization. Once mechanical factors are excluded as a cause for reduced epicardial flow, the treatment of established no-reflow is mainly pharmacologic, since the obstruction occurs at the level of the microvasculature. Compared with patients in whom no-reflow is transient, refractory no-reflow is associated with a markedly increased risk of 30-day mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17605650     DOI: 10.1586/14779072.5.4.715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther        ISSN: 1477-9072


  9 in total

Review 1.  CMR for characterization of the myocardium in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Erica Dall'Armellina; Theodoros D Karamitsos; Stefan Neubauer; Robin P Choudhury
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Updates on Stress Imaging Testing and Myocardial Viability With Advanced Imaging Modalities.

Authors:  Sandeep S Hedgire; Michael Osborne; Daniel J Verdini; Brian B Ghoshhajra
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-04

3.  Current State of the Art in Approaches to Saphenous Vein Graft Interventions.

Authors:  Michael Lee; Jeremy Kong
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2017-09

4.  Percutaneous cardiopulmonary support in refractory no-reflow with cardiogenic shock after coronary stenting in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jung-Woo Son; Jin-Sun Kim; Jung Myung Lee; Sung Jin Hong; Min Kyu Jung; Duk-Hwan Kim; Jung-Sun Kim; Donghoon Choi; Yangsoo Jang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 5.  Cardiac MR imaging: current status and future direction.

Authors:  Maythem Saeed; Tu Anh Van; Roland Krug; Steven W Hetts; Mark W Wilson
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2015-08

6.  Dynamic changes of edema and late gadolinium enhancement after acute myocardial infarction and their relationship to functional recovery and salvage index.

Authors:  Erica Dall'Armellina; Nina Karia; Alistair C Lindsay; Theodoros D Karamitsos; Vanessa Ferreira; Matthew D Robson; Peter Kellman; Jane M Francis; Colin Forfar; Bernard D Prendergast; Adrian P Banning; Keith M Channon; Rajesh K Kharbanda; Stefan Neubauer; Robin P Choudhury
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 7.792

7.  Rotational Atherectomy in Acute STEMI with Heavily Calcified Culprit Lesion is a Rule Breaking Solution.

Authors:  Mohammady Shahin; Alessandro Candreva; Patrick T Siegrist
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2018

8.  A compare between myocardial topical negative pressure levels of -25 mmHg and -50 mmHg in a porcine model.

Authors:  Sandra Lindstedt; Per Paulsson; Arash Mokhtari; Bodil Gesslein; Joanna Hlebowicz; Malin Malmsjö; Richard Ingemansson
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2008-06-22       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  Prognostic Association of Circulating Neutrophil Count with No-Reflow in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction following Successful Primary Percutaneous Intervention.

Authors:  Jinfan Tian; Yue Liu; Yanfei Liu; Xiantao Song; Min Zhang; Feng Xu; Fei Yuan; Shuzheng Lyu
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.434

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.