Literature DB >> 21447689

Automated perimetry: using gaze-direction data to improve the estimate of scotoma edges.

Harry J Wyatt1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To make an initial assessment of the feasibility of using records of eye movements during perimetry to improve the estimate of scotoma edge location.
METHODS: The nasal edge of the blind spot was mapped in seven normal subjects with a 2° grid of test locations, using a custom test station, while gaze direction was monitored with an eye tracker. Records were analyzed to determine whether the combined sensitivity and eye movement data could be used to estimate the nature of the blind spot edge. RESULTS; Analysis was conducted for 15 high-variability test locations. For 11 locations the blind spot edge estimates fit plausibly with the general form of the blind spot (edge orientation within 90° of expected); for four locations the agreement was poor. One consequence of interpreting the test results using the edge estimates was an average reduction of test-retest variability by 58%.
CONCLUSIONS: Recordings of eye movements during perimetry can be used to generate an improved estimate of scotoma boundaries. A byproduct of the new estimate is a substantial reduction of test-retest variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21447689      PMCID: PMC3176040          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  16 in total

1.  Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry.

Authors:  P G Spry; C A Johnson; A M McKendrick; A Turpin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Response variability in the visual field: comparison of optic neuritis, glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes.

Authors:  D B Henson; S Chaudry; P H Artes; E B Faragher; A Ansons
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Variability of visual field measurements is correlated with the gradient of visual sensitivity.

Authors:  Harry J Wyatt; Mitchell W Dul; William H Swanson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Eye Movements During Perimetry and the Effect that Fixational Instability Has on Perimetric Outcomes.

Authors:  S Demirel; A J Vingrys
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.

Authors:  M Wall; K E Kutzko; B C Chauhan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields.

Authors:  A Heijl; A Lindgren; G Lindgren
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-08-15       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Increase of the short-term fluctuation of the differential light threshold around a physiologic scotoma.

Authors:  I O Haefliger; J Flammer
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-04-15       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field.

Authors:  A Heijl; G Lindgren; J Olsson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-11

9.  Evaluation of a two-stage neural model of glaucomatous defect: an approach to reduce test-retest variability.

Authors:  Fei Pan; William H Swanson; Mitchell W Dul
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects.

Authors:  B C Chauhan; C A Johnson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  2 in total

1.  Choice of Stimulus Range and Size Can Reduce Test-Retest Variability in Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects.

Authors:  William H Swanson; Douglas G Horner; Mitchell W Dul; Victor E Malinovsky
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.283

2.  Evidence for alterations in fixational eye movements in glaucoma.

Authors:  Giovanni Montesano; David P Crabb; Pete R Jones; Paolo Fogagnolo; Maurizio Digiuni; Luca M Rossetti
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.209

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.