Literature DB >> 12880801

Right hemisphere control of visuospatial attention: line-bisection judgments evaluated with high-density electrical mapping and source analysis.

John J Foxe1, Mark E McCourt, Daniel C Javitt.   

Abstract

The "line-bisection" task has proven an especially useful clinical tool for assessment of spatial neglect syndrome in neurological patients. Here, we investigated the neural processes involved in performing this task by recording high-density event-related potentials from 128 scalp electrodes in normal observers. We characterized a robust net negative potential from 170-400 ms poststimulus presentation that correlates with line-bisection judgments. Topographic mapping shows three distinct phases to this negativity. The first phase (approximately 170-190 ms) has a scalp distribution exclusively over the right parieto-occipital and lateral occipital scalp, consistent with generators in the region of the right temporo-parietal junction and right lateral occipital cortices. The second phase (approximately 190-240 ms) sees the emergence of a second negative focus over the right central parietal scalp, consistent with subsequent involvement of right superior parietal cortices. In the third phase (approximately 240-400 ms), the topography becomes dominated by this right central parietal negativity. Inverse source modeling confirmed that right hemisphere lateral occipital, inferior parietal, and superior parietal regions were the likeliest generators of the bulk of the activity associated with this effect. The line stimuli were also presented at three contrast levels (3, 25, and 100%) in order to manipulate both the latency of stimulus processing and the relative contributions from magnocellular and parvocellular inputs. Through this manipulation, we show that the line-bisection effect systematically tracks/follows the latency of the N1 component, which is considered a temporal marker for object processing in the ventral visual stream. This pattern of effects suggests that this task invokes an allocentric (object-based) form of visuospatial attention. Further, at 3% contrast, the line-bisection effect was equivalent to the effects seen at higher contrast levels, suggesting that parvocellular inputs are not necessary for successful performance of this task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12880801     DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00057-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  65 in total

1.  Setting boundaries: brain dynamics of modal and amodal illusory shape completion in humans.

Authors:  Micah M Murray; Deirdre M Foxe; Daniel C Javitt; John J Foxe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Examining the influence of 'noise' on judgements of spatial extent.

Authors:  Derick F Valadao; Marc Hurwitz; James Danckert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Left of centre: asymmetries for the horizontal vertical line illusion.

Authors:  Elisha K Josev; Jason D Forte; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-11-25

4.  Hemispheric asymmetries in perceived depth revealed through a radial line bisection task.

Authors:  Ancrêt Szpak; Nicole A Thomas; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Throwing out the rules: anticipatory alpha-band oscillatory attention mechanisms during task-set reconfigurations.

Authors:  John J Foxe; Jeremy W Murphy; Pierfilippo De Sanctis
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  What does the dot-probe task measure? A reverse correlation analysis of electrocortical activity.

Authors:  Nina N Thigpen; L Forest Gruss; Steven Garcia; David R Herring; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  A stimulus-dependent dissociation between the cerebral hemispheres under free-viewing conditions.

Authors:  Matia Okubo; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The perceptual consequences of the attentional bias: evidence for distractor removal.

Authors:  Matthias Niemeier; Vaughan V W Singh; Matthew Keough; Nadine Akbar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Pseudoneglect for mental alphabet lines is affected by prismatic adaptation.

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Adrian Kamer; Andrea M Loftus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Auditory processing in schizophrenia during the middle latency period (10-50 ms): high-density electrical mapping and source analysis reveal subcortical antecedents to early cortical deficits.

Authors:  Victoria M Leavitt; Sophie Molholm; Walter Ritter; Marina Shpaner; John J Foxe
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.