Literature DB >> 10954644

Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain.

W E Hoogendoorn1, M N van Poppel, P M Bongers, B W Koes, L M Bouter.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A systematic review of observational studies.
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether psychosocial factors at work and in private life are risk factors for the occurrence of back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several reviews on risk factors for back pain have paid attention to psychosocial factors. However, in none of the published reviews was a strict systematic approach used to identify and summarize the available evidence.
METHODS: A computerized bibliographical search of several databases was performed, restricted to studies with a cohort or case-control design. A rating system was used to assess the strength of the evidence for various factors, based on the methodologic quality of the studies and the consistency of the findings.
RESULTS: Eleven cohort and two case-control studies were included in this review. Strong evidence was found for low social support in the workplace and low job satisfaction as risk factors for back pain. Insufficient evidence was found for an effect of a high work pace, high qualitative demands, low job content, low job control, and psychosocial factors in private life.
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence was found for an effect of low workplace social support and low job satisfaction. However, the result for workplace social support was sensitive to slight changes in the rating system, and the effect found for low job satisfaction may be a result of insufficient adjustment for psychosocial work characteristics and physical load at work. In addition, the combined evaluation of job content and job control, both aspects of decision latitude, led to strong evidence of a role for low job decision latitude. Thus, based on this review, there is evidence for an effect of work-related psychosocial factors, but the evidence for the role of specific factors has not been established yet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10954644     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200008150-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  184 in total

Review 1.  Occupational psychological factors increase the risk for back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  S J Linton
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-03

2.  High physical work load and low job satisfaction increase the risk of sickness absence due to low back pain: results of a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  W E Hoogendoorn; P M Bongers; H C W de Vet; G A M Ariëns; W van Mechelen; L M Bouter
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 3.  Psychosocial factors at work in relation to low back pain and consequences of low back pain; a systematic, critical review of prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  J Hartvigsen; S Lings; C Leboeuf-Yde; L Bakketeig
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Use of back belts to prevent occupational low-back pain. Recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-08-05       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Service sector and perceived social support at work in Norwegian nurses' aides.

Authors:  Willy Eriksen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-08-05       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Transitions in self-reported musculoskeletal pain and interference with activities among newspaper workers.

Authors:  Donald C Cole; Michael Manno; Dorcas Beaton; Michael Swift
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-09

Review 7.  Longitudinal evidence for the association between work-related physical exposures and neck and/or shoulder complaints: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julia Mayer; Thomas Kraus; Elke Ochsmann
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 8.  Determinants of heart failure self-care: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  R Oosterom-Calo; A J van Ballegooijen; C B Terwee; S J te Velde; I A Brouwer; T Jaarsma; J Brug
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.214

9.  High frequency of McKenzie's postural syndrome in young population of non-care seeking individuals.

Authors:  Stephen May; Gauri Nanche; Sampada Pingle
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-02

10.  Physical and psychosocial risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders in Brazilian and Italian nurses.

Authors:  Michele Carugno; Angela Cecilia Pesatori; Marco Mario Ferrario; Andrea Lepos Ferrari; Fábio Jose da Silva; Aline Caldas Martins; Vanda Elisa Andres Felli; David Coggon; Matteo Bonzini
Journal:  Cad Saude Publica       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.632

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.