Literature DB >> 22836364

Validation of a novel spinal posture monitor: comparison with digital videofluoroscopy.

Kieran O'Sullivan1, Sabine Verschueren, Steven Pans, David Smets, Karel Dekelver, Wim Dankaerts.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A novel, minimally invasive posture monitor which can monitor lumbar postures outside the laboratory has demonstrated excellent reliability, as well as concurrent validity compared to a surface marker-based motion analysis system. However, it is unclear if this device reflects underlying vertebral motion.
METHODS: Twelve participants performed full range sagittal plane lumbo-pelvic movements during sitting and standing. Their posture was measured simultaneously using both this device (BodyGuard™) and digital videofluoroscopy.
RESULTS: Strong correlations were observed between the two methods (all r (s) > 0.88). Similarly, the coefficients of determination were high (all r (2) > 0.78). The maximum mean difference between the measures was located in the mid-range of motion and was approximately 3.4° in sitting and 3.9° in standing.
CONCLUSION: The BodyGuard™ appears to be a valid method for analysing vertebral motion in the sagittal plane and is a promising tool for long-term monitoring of spinal postures in laboratory and clinical settings in people with low back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22836364      PMCID: PMC3508222          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2440-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  29 in total

1.  [Validity and reliability of Spinal Mouse to assess lumbar flexion].

Authors:  M Guermazi; S Ghroubi; M Kassis; O Jaziri; H Keskes; W Kessomtini; I Ben Hammouda; M-H Elleuch
Journal:  Ann Readapt Med Phys       Date:  2006-03-20

2.  The prediction of lumbar spine geometry: method development and validation.

Authors:  Naira Campbell-Kyureghyan; Michael Jorgensen; Deborah Burr; William Marras
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  The use of a mechanism-based classification system to evaluate and direct management of a patient with non-specific chronic low back pain and motor control impairment--a case report.

Authors:  W Dankaerts; P B O'Sullivan; A F Burnett; L M Straker
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2006-07-31

4.  Towards monitoring lumbo-pelvic posture in real-life situations: concurrent validity of a novel posture monitor and a traditional laboratory-based motion analysis system.

Authors:  Kieran O'Sullivan; Leonard O'Sullivan; Amity Campbell; Peter O'Sullivan; Wim Dankaerts
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2011-10-19

5.  Preliminary study: reliability of the spinal wheel. A novel device to measure spinal postures applied to sitting and standing.

Authors:  Liba Sheeran; Valerie Sparkes; Monica Busse; Robert van Deursen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A new approach to assess movements and isometric postures of spine and trunk at the workplace.

Authors:  Max Wunderlich; Thomas Rüther; Dieter Essfeld; Thomas C Erren; Claus Piekarski; Dieter Leyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Pelvic mobility when bending forward in standing position: validity and reliability of 2 motion analysis devices.

Authors:  C Perret; S Poiraudeau; J Fermanian; M Revel
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 8.  Causal assessment of occupational sitting and low back pain: results of a systematic review.

Authors:  Darren M Roffey; Eugene K Wai; Paul Bishop; Brian K Kwon; Simon Dagenais
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 9.  Causal assessment of awkward occupational postures and low back pain: results of a systematic review.

Authors:  Darren M Roffey; Eugene K Wai; Paul Bishop; Brian K Kwon; Simon Dagenais
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Classification of sagittal thoraco-lumbo-pelvic alignment of the adolescent spine in standing and its relationship to low back pain.

Authors:  Anne Smith; Peter O'Sullivan; Leon Straker
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  6 in total

1.  Clinically acceptable agreement between the ViMove wireless motion sensor system and the Vicon motion capture system when measuring lumbar region inclination motion in the sagittal and coronal planes.

Authors:  Hanne Leirbekk Mjøsund; Eleanor Boyle; Per Kjaer; Rune Mygind Mieritz; Tue Skallgård; Peter Kent
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  A Validation Study of a Polymer Optical Fiber Sensor for Monitoring Lumbar Spine Movement.

Authors:  Wern Kam; Mary O'Keeffe; Kieran O'Sullivan; Waleed S Mohammed; Sinead O'Keeffe; Elfed Lewis; Charusluk Viphavakit
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  The role of wearables in spinal posture analysis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lauren Simpson; Monish M Maharaj; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Effect of cycling exercise on lumbopelvic control performance in elite female cyclists.

Authors:  Cristina San Emeterio; Héctor Menéndez; Paloma Guillén-Rogel; Pedro J Marín
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.041

5.  Reducing lumbar spine flexion using real-time biofeedback during patient handling tasks.

Authors:  Mohammadhasan Owlia; Megan Kamachi; Tilak Dutta
Journal:  Work       Date:  2020

6.  Myofascial Treatment for Microcirculation in Patients with Postural Neck and Shoulder Pain.

Authors:  Jian-Guo Bau; Shyi-Kuen Wu; Bo-Wen Huang; Tony Tung-Liang Lin; Shih-Chung Huang
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.