Literature DB >> 21441320

Transient fecal shedding and limited animal-to-animal transmission of Clostridium difficile by naturally infected finishing feedlot cattle.

Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios1, Carrie Pickworth, Steve Loerch, Jeffrey T LeJeune.   

Abstract

To longitudinally assess fecal shedding and animal-to-animal transmission of Clostridium difficile among finishing feedlot cattle as a risk for beef carcass contamination, we tested 186 ± 12 steers (mean ± standard deviation; 1,369 samples) in an experimental feedlot facility during the finishing period and at harvest. Clostridium difficile was isolated from 12.9% of steers on arrival (24/186; 0 to 33% among five suppliers). Shedding decreased to undetectable levels a week later (0%; P < 0.001), and remained low (< 3.6%) until immediately prior to shipment for harvest (1.2%). Antimicrobial use did not increase fecal shedding, despite treatment of 53% of animals for signs of respiratory disease. Animals shedding C. difficile on arrival, however, had 4.6 times higher odds of receiving antimicrobials for respiratory signs than nonshedders (95% confidence interval for the odds ratio, 1.4 to 14.8; P = 0.01). Neither the toxin genes nor toxin A or B was detected in most (39/42) isolates based on two complementary multiplex PCRs and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay testing, respectively. Two linezolid- and clindamycin-resistant PCR ribotype 078 (tcdA+/tcdB+/cdtB+/39-bp-type deletion in tcdC) isolates were identified from two steers (at arrival and week 20), but these ribotypes did not become endemic. The other toxigenic isolate (tcdA+/tcdB+/cdtB+/classic tcdC; PCR ribotype 078-like) was identified in the cecum of one steer at harvest. Spatio-temporal analysis indicated transient shedding with no evidence of animal-to-animal transmission. The association between C. difficile shedding upon arrival and the subsequent need for antimicrobials for respiratory disease might indicate common predisposing factors. The isolation of toxigenic C. difficile from bovine intestines at harvest highlights the potential for food contamination in meat processing plants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21441320      PMCID: PMC3126469          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02736-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  42 in total

1.  Preliminary evidence for dormant clostridial spores in equine skeletal muscle.

Authors:  M Vengust; L G Arroyo; J S Weese; J D Baird
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  [Evaluation of four rapid methods for the investigation of the toxigenic capacity of Clostridium difficile strains isolated in a selective medium].

Authors:  A García; J L Pérez; A Pulido; J Niubó; P Pérez; R Martín
Journal:  Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  Occurrence of anaerobic bacterial, clostridial, and Clostridium perfringens spores in raw goose livers from a poultry processing plant in Hungary.

Authors:  J Turcsán; L Varga; Z Turcsán; J Szigeti; L Farkas
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.077

4.  Molecular analysis of the pathogenicity locus and polymorphism in the putative negative regulator of toxin production (TcdC) among Clostridium difficile clinical isolates.

Authors:  Patrizia Spigaglia; Paola Mastrantonio
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  A review of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis, shipping fever pneumonia and viral-bacterial synergism in respiratory disease of cattle.

Authors:  W D Yates
Journal:  Can J Comp Med       Date:  1982-07

Review 6.  ASAS Centennial Paper: Developments and future outlook for preharvest food safety.

Authors:  S P Oliver; D A Patel; T R Callaway; M E Torrence
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 7.  Update on the changing epidemiology of Clostridium difficile-associated disease.

Authors:  Lynne V McFarland
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-01

8.  The distribution of Clostridium difficile in the environment of South Wales.

Authors:  N al Saif; J S Brazier
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  Possible seasonality of Clostridium difficile in retail meat, Canada.

Authors:  Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios; Richard J Reid-Smith; Henry R Staempfli; Danielle Daignault; Nicol Janecko; Brent P Avery; Hayley Martin; Angela D Thomspon; L Clifford McDonald; Brandi Limbago; J Scott Weese
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Clostridium difficile in ready-to-eat salads, Scotland.

Authors:  Marwah M Bakri; Derek J Brown; John P Butcher; Alistair D Sutherland
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Clostridium difficile in Food and Animals: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  C Rodriguez; B Taminiau; J Van Broeck; M Delmée; G Daube
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Prevalence of Clostridium difficile in uncooked ground meat products from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Scott R Curry; Jane W Marsh; Jessica L Schlackman; Lee H Harrison
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Clostridioides difficile ribotypes isolated from domestic environment and from patients in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Mohammad Aminul Islam; Nayel D Kabir; M Moniruzzaman; Khurshida Begum; Dilruba Ahmed; A S G Faruque; Kevin W Garey; M Jahangir Alam
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.331

4.  Three-week summer period prevalence of Clostridium difficile in farm animals in a temperate region of the United States (Ohio).

Authors:  Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios; Tim Barman; Jeffrey T LeJeune
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.008

5.  Different antibiotic resistance and sporulation properties within multiclonal Clostridium difficile PCR ribotypes 078, 126, and 033 in a single calf farm.

Authors:  Valerija Zidaric; Bart Pardon; Tiago Dos Vultos; Piet Deprez; Michael Sebastiaan Maria Brouwer; Adam P Roberts; Adriano O Henriques; Maja Rupnik
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Prevalence and molecular characterization of Clostridium difficile isolated from feedlot beef cattle upon arrival and mid-feeding period.

Authors:  Marcio C Costa; Richard Reid-Smith; Sheryl Gow; Sherry J Hannon; Calvin Booker; Joyce Rousseau; Katharine M Benedict; Paul S Morley; J Scott Weese
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Clostridium difficile with Moxifloxacin/Clindamycin Resistance in Vegetables in Ohio, USA, and Prevalence Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alex Rodriguez-Palacios; Sanja Ilic; Jeffrey T LeJeune
Journal:  J Pathog       Date:  2014-12-14

8.  Identification of risk factors influencing Clostridium difficile prevalence in middle-size dairy farms.

Authors:  Petra Bandelj; Rok Blagus; France Briski; Olga Frlic; Aleksandra Vergles Rataj; Maja Rupnik; Matjaz Ocepek; Modest Vengust
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.683

9.  Subboiling Moist Heat Favors the Selection of Enteric Pathogen Clostridium difficile PCR Ribotype 078 Spores in Food.

Authors:  Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios; Sanja Ilic; Jeffrey T LeJeune
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.471

10.  Quantification of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in feces of calves of different age and determination of predominant Clostridioides difficile ribotype 033 relatedness and transmission between family dairy farms using multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis.

Authors:  Petra Bandelj; Céline Harmanus; Rok Blagus; Marko Cotman; Ed J Kuijper; Matjaz Ocepek; Modest Vengust
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.