Literature DB >> 19402979

Clostridium difficile in ready-to-eat salads, Scotland.

Marwah M Bakri1, Derek J Brown, John P Butcher, Alistair D Sutherland.   

Abstract

Of 40 ready-to-eat salads, 3 (7.5%) were positive for Clostridium difficile by PCR. Two isolates were PCR ribotype 017 (toxin A-, B+), and 1 was PCR ribotype 001. Isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and metronidazole but variably resistant to other antimicrobial drugs. Ready-to-eat salads may be potential sources for virulent C. difficile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19402979      PMCID: PMC2687046          DOI: 10.3201/eid1505.081186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Over the past decade, Clostridium difficile infection has become a prominent cause of healthcare-associated infection. Although C. difficile has been thought of traditionally as a predominantly nosocomial infection, the incidence of community-acquired cases has increased recently, as has the incidence of cases from other healthcare settings such as nursing homes (). Notably, some evidence has shown that C. difficile may be brought into the healthcare environment by asymptomatic carriers (). The reported carriage rates of C. difficile in healthy adults have varied from 0% to 3% in Europe to up to 15% in Japan (). Little is known, however, about the prevalence of C. difficile in the environment and how it may be transmitted to humans. C. difficile has been found in a variety of environments, including water, soil, animal feces, and foods (,); these findings suggest that C. difficile may be transmitted to humans through food, although no foodborne cases have been reported. Because ready-to-eat foods have been implicated in foodborne disease outbreaks associated with Salmonella species () and Escherichia coli O157 (), we examined ready-to-eat salads for the presence of C. difficile.

The Study

We tested 50-g samples from each of 40 packaged ready-to-eat salads purchased from 7 Glasgow supermarkets from May 1 through June 30, 2008, for the presence of C. difficile spores. We essentially used the CDMN (C. difficile, moxalactam, norfloxacin) agar method of Rodriguez-Palacios et al. () but also used direct plating and enrichment broth culture. The contents of the 40 salads generally differed, and any salads with the same contents carried different supermarket brands, which eliminated replicate sampling. Isolates were identified as toxigenic (having genes for toxins A and B) by PCR as previously described (,), and ribotypes were identified by PCR (). The MICs of 6 antimicrobial drugs for these isolates were determined by using E-test strips (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). The following MIC breakpoints were used to define resistance to these drugs: metronidazole, >32 µg/mL; vancomycin, >16 µg/mL; cefotaxime, 64 µg/mL; erythromycin, >8 µg/mL; moxifloxacin, >8 µg/mL; and clindamycin, >8 µg/mL (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA, USA). C. difficile spores were detected in 3 (7.5%) of the 40 salad samples after culturing in enrichment broth (Table 1). Thirty-five (87.5%) of the salads were marked as imported from European Union countries; the remaining 5 were from UK suppliers. The 3 contaminated salads were not of UK origin. The 3 isolates were found to be toxinogenic by PCR; 2 were PCR ribotype 017, and 1 was PCR ribotype 001 (Table 1).
Table 1

PCR profile for toxins A and B and PCR ribotype of Clostridium difficile isolates, Scotland, 2008

Sample no./descriptionToxin AToxin BPCR ribotype
13/baby leaf spinach+017
24/organic mixed leaf salad+017
35/organic lettuce++001
The MICs of 6 antimicrobial drugs for each isolate and the resistance profile of each isolate are shown in Table 2. None of the isolates was resistant to vancomycin or metronidazole, and only the 001 isolate was resistant to moxifloxacin and erythromycin. All 3 isolates were resistant or intermediately resistant to clindamycin and cefotaxime; breakpoints for these drugs were highest for the 001 isolate.
Table 2

Susceptibility of 3 Clostridium difficile isolates to 6 antimicrobial drugs, by source of isolate, Scotland, UK, 2008*

Antimicrobial drugSource of isolate
Baby leaf spinach (MIC, µg/mL)Organic mixed leaf salad (MIC, µg/mL)Organic lettuce (MIC, µg/mL)
MetronidazoleS (0.125)S (0.094)S (0.75)
VancomycinS (0.50)S (0.38)S (1.0)
MoxifloxacinS (0.50)S (0.75)R (256)
ClindamycinI (4.0)I (6.0)R (8.0)
ErythromycinS (1.5)S (0.75)R (192)
CefotaximeI (48)R (64)R (256)

*S, sensitive; R, resistant; I, intermediate.

*S, sensitive; R, resistant; I, intermediate. Isolates were obtained after being cultured in enrichment broth and not by direct plating, which suggests that spore counts were low (<3.0 CFU/g). The infectious dose required to colonize the healthy human gut is, however, unknown. Isolates were of PCR ribotypes 001 (a common clinical isolate in Scotland [11]) and 017 (a common European PCR ribotype containing isolates that are negative for toxin A and positive for toxin B []). No isolate was resistant to vancomycin or metronidazole, which is in accord with findings for other C. difficile isolates found in Scotland (), but recent studies have highlighted the emergence of increased resistance to metronidazole among C. difficile isolates in England (). In general, the PCR ribotype 001 isolate was more drug resistant than the 017 isolates; it was the only isolate resistant to moxifloxacin and erythromycin and had the highest breakpoints to clindamycin and cefotaxime. In a 2005 study in which 271 C. difficile isolates from the UK were examined, all were found to be resistant to cefotaxime ().

Conclusions

The isolation of these PCR ribotypes from ready-to-eat salads is of concern and highlights the potential risk associated with consuming these salads, particularly since they are not cooked before being consumed. The consumption of these foods by vulnerable groups could possibly lead to C. difficile colonization and an increase in the asymptomatic C. difficile carriage rate among humans, thus increasing the risk for C. difficile transference within the healthcare environment (). The presence of C. difficile in ready-to-eat salads could result from environmental contamination or transmission by food handlers. Further work is needed to investigate foods as a source of this pathogen and also to assess the role of soil and animals as its reservoirs.
  11 in total

1.  Molecular characterization and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Clostridium difficile strains isolated from hospitals in south-east Scotland.

Authors:  Esvet Mutlu; Allison J Wroe; Karla Sanchez-Hurtado; Jon S Brazier; Ian R Poxton
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  PCR targeted to the 16S-23S rRNA gene intergenic spacer region of Clostridium difficile and construction of a library consisting of 116 different PCR ribotypes.

Authors:  S L Stubbs; J S Brazier; G L O'Neill; B I Duerden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of polymerase chain reaction ribotypes of Clostridium difficile commonly isolated from symptomatic hospital patients in the UK.

Authors:  R John; J S Brazier
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 4.  Implications of the changing face of Clostridium difficile disease for health care practitioners.

Authors:  Lynne V McFarland; Henry W Beneda; Jill E Clarridge; Gregory J Raugi
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.918

5.  Characterization of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile isolates from outbreaks in different countries by amplified fragment length polymorphism and PCR ribotyping.

Authors:  Renate J van den Berg; Eric C J Claas; Duddy H Oyib; Corné H W Klaassen; Lenie Dijkshoorn; Jon S Brazier; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Behavior of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in leafy vegetables.

Authors:  Pascal Delaquis; Susan Bach; Laura-Dorina Dinu
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.077

7.  The distribution of Clostridium difficile in the environment of South Wales.

Authors:  N al Saif; J S Brazier
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.472

8.  Microbiological study of ready-to-eat salad vegetables from retail establishments uncovers a national outbreak of salmonellosis.

Authors:  S K Sagoo; C L Little; L Ward; I A Gillespie; R T Mitchell
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.077

9.  Local and systemic neutralizing antibody responses induced by intranasal immunization with the nontoxic binding domain of toxin A from Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  S J Ward; G Douce; G Dougan; B W Wren
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Clostridium difficile in retail ground meat, Canada.

Authors:  Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios; Henry R Staempfli; Todd Duffield; J Scott Weese
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  27 in total

1.  Isolation of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile from Animal Manure and Composts Being Used as Biological Soil Amendments.

Authors:  Muthu Dharmasena; Xiuping Jiang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Transient fecal shedding and limited animal-to-animal transmission of Clostridium difficile by naturally infected finishing feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios; Carrie Pickworth; Steve Loerch; Jeffrey T LeJeune
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  The changing epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  J Freeman; M P Bauer; S D Baines; J Corver; W N Fawley; B Goorhuis; E J Kuijper; M H Wilcox
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 4.  The ecology and pathobiology of Clostridium difficile infections: an interdisciplinary challenge.

Authors:  E R Dubberke; D B Haslam; C Lanzas; L D Bobo; C-A D Burnham; Y T Gröhn; P I Tarr
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 2.702

5.  Clostridium difficile infection: An overview of the disease and its pathogenesis, epidemiology and interventions.

Authors:  V K Viswanathan; M J Mallozzi; Gayatri Vedantam
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2010-06-16

6.  Comparison of Clostridium difficile Ribotypes Circulating in Australian Hospitals and Communities.

Authors:  Luis Furuya-Kanamori; Thomas V Riley; David L Paterson; Niki F Foster; Charlotte A Huber; Stacey Hong; Tiffany Harris-Brown; Jenny Robson; Archie C A Clements
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Fidaxomicin in Clostridium difficile infection: latest evidence and clinical guidance.

Authors:  Kathleen Mullane
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  An Evaluation of Food as a Potential Source for Clostridium difficile Acquisition in Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Jennie H Kwon; Cristina Lanzas; Kimberly A Reske; Tiffany Hink; Sondra M Seiler; Kerry M Bommarito; Carey-Ann D Burnham; Erik R Dubberke
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.254

9.  The A, B, BI, and Cs of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Erik R Dubberke
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Nature isn't what it used to be.

Authors:  Polyxeni Potter
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.