Literature DB >> 23001653

Different antibiotic resistance and sporulation properties within multiclonal Clostridium difficile PCR ribotypes 078, 126, and 033 in a single calf farm.

Valerija Zidaric1, Bart Pardon, Tiago Dos Vultos, Piet Deprez, Michael Sebastiaan Maria Brouwer, Adam P Roberts, Adriano O Henriques, Maja Rupnik.   

Abstract

Clostridium difficile strains were sampled periodically from 50 animals at a single veal calf farm over a period of 6 months. At arrival, 10% of animals were C. difficile positive, and the peak incidence was determined to occur at the age of 18 days (16%). The prevalence then decreased, and at slaughter, C. difficile could not be isolated. Six different PCR ribotypes were detected, and strains within a single PCR ribotype could be differentiated further by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). The PCR ribotype diversity was high up to the animal age of 18 days, but at later sampling points, PCR ribotype 078 and the highly related PCR ribotype 126 predominated. Resistance to tetracycline, doxycycline, and erythromycin was detected, while all strains were susceptible to amoxicillin and metronidazole. Multiple variations of the resistance gene tet(M) were present at the same sampling point, and these changed over time. We have shown that PCR ribotypes often associated with cattle (ribotypes 078, 126, and 033) were not clonal but differed in PFGE type, sporulation properties, antibiotic sensitivities, and tetracycline resistance determinants, suggesting that multiple strains of the same PCR ribotype infected the calves and that calves were likely to be infected prior to arrival at the farm. Importantly, strains isolated at later time points were more likely to be resistant to tetracycline and erythromycin and showed higher early sporulation efficiencies in vitro, suggesting that these two properties converge to promote the persistence of C. difficile in the environment or in hosts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23001653      PMCID: PMC3502897          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02185-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  47 in total

1.  Prevalence, enumeration, and antimicrobial agent resistance of Clostridium difficile in cattle at harvest in the United States.

Authors:  Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios; Mohammad Koohmaraie; Jeffrey T LeJeune
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.077

Review 2.  Structure and assembly of the bacterial endospore coat.

Authors:  A O Henriques; C P Moran
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile on a veal farm: prevalence, molecular characterization and tetracycline resistance.

Authors:  M C Costa; H R Stämpfli; L G Arroyo; D L Pearl; J S Weese
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Acquisition of Clostridium difficile by piglets.

Authors:  N E M Hopman; E C Keessen; C Harmanus; I M J G Sanders; L A M G van Leengoed; E J Kuijper; L J A Lipman
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Longitudinal investigation of Clostridium difficile shedding in piglets.

Authors:  J Scott Weese; Terra Wakeford; Richard Reid-Smith; Joyce Rousseau; Robert Friendship
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.331

6.  Clostridium difficile in poultry and poultry meat.

Authors:  Roger B Harvey; Keri N Norman; Kathleen Andrews; Michael E Hume; Charles M Scanlan; Todd R Callaway; Robin C Anderson; David J Nisbet
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.171

7.  The diverse sporulation characteristics of Clostridium difficile clinical isolates are not associated with type.

Authors:  David A Burns; John T Heap; Nigel P Minton
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 3.331

8.  Prospective study of Clostridium difficile infections in Europe with phenotypic and genotypic characterisation of the isolates.

Authors:  F Barbut; P Mastrantonio; M Delmée; J Brazier; E Kuijper; I Poxton
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 8.067

9.  Use of sodium taurocholate to enhance spore recovery on a medium selective for Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  K H Wilson; M J Kennedy; F R Fekety
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  A novel toxinotyping scheme and correlation of toxinotypes with serogroups of Clostridium difficile isolates.

Authors:  M Rupnik; V Avesani; M Janc; C von Eichel-Streiber; M Delmée
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  18 in total

1.  Clostridium difficile genotypes in piglet populations in Germany.

Authors:  Alexander Schneeberg; Heinrich Neubauer; Gernot Schmoock; Sylvia Baier; Jürgen Harlizius; Hendrik Nienhoff; Katja Brase; Stefan Zimmermann; Christian Seyboldt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Clostridium difficile in Food and Animals: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  C Rodriguez; B Taminiau; J Van Broeck; M Delmée; G Daube
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Immunomodulatory effects of Moringa oleifera leaves aqueous extract in sheep naturally co-infected with Fasciola gigantica and Clostridium novyi.

Authors:  Eman E El Shanawany; Ehab A Fouad; Hany G Keshta; Soad E Hassan; Ahmed G Hegazi; Eman H Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2019-08-02

4.  Prevalence of gastrointestinal Clostridium difficile carriage in Australian sheep and lambs.

Authors:  Daniel R Knight; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  DNA microarray-based PCR ribotyping of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Alexander Schneeberg; Ralf Ehricht; Peter Slickers; Vico Baier; Heinrich Neubauer; Stefan Zimmermann; Denise Rabold; Antina Lübke-Becker; Christian Seyboldt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection and risk factors for unfavorable clinical outcomes: results of a hospital-based study in Barcelona, Spain.

Authors:  Dolors Rodríguez-Pardo; Benito Almirante; Rosa M Bartolomé; Virginia Pomar; Beatriz Mirelis; Ferran Navarro; Alex Soriano; Luisa Sorlí; Joaquín Martínez-Montauti; Maria Teresa Molins; Maily Lung; Jordi Vila; Albert Pahissa
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Cross-sectional study reveals high prevalence of Clostridium difficile non-PCR ribotype 078 strains in Australian veal calves at slaughter.

Authors:  Daniel R Knight; Sara Thean; Papanin Putsathit; Stan Fenwick; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Characterization of temperate phages infecting Clostridium difficile isolates of human and animal origins.

Authors:  Ognjen Sekulovic; Julian R Garneau; Audrey Néron; Louis-Charles Fortier
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Study of the frequency of Clostridium difficile tcdA, tcdB, cdtA and cdtB genes in feces of Calves in south west of Iran.

Authors:  Abbas Doosti; Abbas Mokhtari-Farsani
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.944

10.  Identification of risk factors influencing Clostridium difficile prevalence in middle-size dairy farms.

Authors:  Petra Bandelj; Rok Blagus; France Briski; Olga Frlic; Aleksandra Vergles Rataj; Maja Rupnik; Matjaz Ocepek; Modest Vengust
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.