Literature DB >> 21439386

Not one extrastriate body area: using anatomical landmarks, hMT+, and visual field maps to parcellate limb-selective activations in human lateral occipitotemporal cortex.

Kevin S Weiner1, Kalanit Grill-Spector.   

Abstract

The prevailing view of human lateral occipitotemporal cortex (LOTC) organization suggests a single area selective for images of the human body (extrastriate body area, EBA) that highly overlaps with the human motion-selective complex (hMT+). Using functional magnetic resonance imaging with higher resolution (1.5mm voxels) than past studies (3-4mm voxels), we examined the fine-scale spatial organization of these activations relative to each other, as well as to visual field maps in LOTC. Rather than one contiguous EBA highly overlapping hMT+, results indicate three limb-selective activations organized in a crescent surrounding hMT+: (1) an activation posterior to hMT+ on the lateral occipital sulcus/middle occipital gyrus (LOS/MOG) overlapping the lower vertical meridian shared between visual field maps LO-2 and TO-1, (2) an activation anterior to hMT+ on the middle temporal gyrus (MTG) consistently overlapping the lower vertical meridian of TO-2 and extending outside presently defined visual field maps, and (3) an activation inferior to hMT+ on the inferotemporal gyrus (ITG) overlapping the parafoveal representation of the TO cluster. This crescent organization of limb-selective activations surrounding hMT+ is reproducible over a span of three years and is consistent across different image types used for localization. Further, these regions exhibit differential position properties: preference for contralateral image presentation decreases and preference for foveal presentation increases from the limb-selective LOS to the MTG. Finally, the relationship between limb-selective activations and visual field maps extends to the dorsal stream where a posterior IPS activation overlaps V7. Overall, our measurements demonstrate a series of LOTC limb-selective activations that 1) have separate anatomical and functional boundaries, 2) overlap distinct visual field maps, and 3) illustrate differential position properties. These findings indicate that category selectivity alone is an insufficient organization principle for defining brain areas. Instead, multiple properties are necessary in order to parcellate and understand the functional organization of high-level visual cortex. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21439386      PMCID: PMC3138128          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  73 in total

1.  fMRI-adaptation and category selectivity in human ventral temporal cortex: regional differences across time scales.

Authors:  Kevin S Weiner; Rory Sayres; Joakim Vinberg; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Object representations in the temporal cortex of monkeys and humans as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Andrew H Bell; Fadila Hadj-Bouziane; Jennifer B Frihauf; Roger B H Tootell; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The processing of three-dimensional shape from disparity in the human brain.

Authors:  Svetlana Georgieva; Ronald Peeters; Hauke Kolster; James T Todd; Guy A Orban
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Dissociable neural responses to hands and non-hand body parts in human left extrastriate visual cortex.

Authors:  Stefania Bracci; Magdalena Ietswaart; Marius V Peelen; Cristiana Cavina-Pratesi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Multiple parietal reach regions in humans: cortical representations for visual and proprioceptive feedback during on-line reaching.

Authors:  Flavia Filimon; Jonathan D Nelson; Ruey-Song Huang; Martin I Sereno
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Neural representations of faces and body parts in macaque and human cortex: a comparative FMRI study.

Authors:  Mark A Pinsk; Michael Arcaro; Kevin S Weiner; Jan F Kalkus; Souheil J Inati; Charles G Gross; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Distributed representation of single touches in somatosensory and visual cortex.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp; Stephen Laconte; Nafi Yasar
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Executed and observed movements have different distributed representations in human aIPS.

Authors:  Ilan Dinstein; Justin L Gardner; Mehrdad Jazayeri; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Visual field maps, population receptive field sizes, and visual field coverage in the human MT+ complex.

Authors:  Kaoru Amano; Brian A Wandell; Serge O Dumoulin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Human v6: the medial motion area.

Authors:  S Pitzalis; M I Sereno; G Committeri; P Fattori; G Galati; F Patria; C Galletti
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  58 in total

1.  Vision, action and language unified through embodiment.

Authors:  Daniele Caligiore; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-02-07

2.  Temporal Processing Capacity in High-Level Visual Cortex Is Domain Specific.

Authors:  Anthony Stigliani; Kevin S Weiner; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The mid-fusiform sulcus: a landmark identifying both cytoarchitectonic and functional divisions of human ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  Kevin S Weiner; Golijeh Golarai; Julian Caspers; Miguel R Chuapoco; Hartmut Mohlberg; Karl Zilles; Katrin Amunts; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Development of population receptive fields in the lateral visual stream improves spatial coding amid stable structural-functional coupling.

Authors:  Jesse Gomez; Alexis Drain; Brianna Jeska; Vaidehi S Natu; Michael Barnett; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Visual processing in anorexia nervosa and body dysmorphic disorder: similarities, differences, and future research directions.

Authors:  Sarah K Madsen; Cara Bohon; Jamie D Feusner
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 4.791

6.  Distinct neural mechanisms for body form and body motion discriminations.

Authors:  Joris Vangeneugden; Marius V Peelen; Duje Tadin; Lorella Battelli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Probabilistic atlases for face and biological motion perception: an analysis of their reliability and overlap.

Authors:  Andrew D Engell; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The vertical occipital fasciculus: a century of controversy resolved by in vivo measurements.

Authors:  Jason D Yeatman; Kevin S Weiner; Franco Pestilli; Ariel Rokem; Aviv Mezer; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Defining the most probable location of the parahippocampal place area using cortex-based alignment and cross-validation.

Authors:  Kevin S Weiner; Michael A Barnett; Nathan Witthoft; Golijeh Golarai; Anthony Stigliani; Kendrick N Kay; Jesse Gomez; Vaidehi S Natu; Katrin Amunts; Karl Zilles; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Voxel-level functional connectivity using spatial regularization.

Authors:  Christopher Baldassano; Marius Cătălin Iordan; Diane M Beck; Li Fei-Fei
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.