Literature DB >> 20393066

Dissociable neural responses to hands and non-hand body parts in human left extrastriate visual cortex.

Stefania Bracci1, Magdalena Ietswaart, Marius V Peelen, Cristiana Cavina-Pratesi.   

Abstract

Accumulating evidence points to a map of visual regions encoding specific categories of objects. For example, a region in the human extrastriate visual cortex, the extrastriate body area (EBA), has been implicated in the visual processing of bodies and body parts. Although in the monkey, neurons selective for hands have been reported, in humans it is unclear whether areas selective for individual body parts such as the hand exist. Here, we conducted two functional MRI experiments to test for hand-preferring responses in the human extrastriate visual cortex. We found evidence for a hand-preferring region in left lateral occipitotemporal cortex in all 14 participants. This region, located in the lateral occipital sulcus, partially overlapped with left EBA, but could be functionally and anatomically dissociated from it. In experiment 2, we further investigated the functional profile of hand- and body-preferring regions by measuring responses to hands, fingers, feet, assorted body parts (arms, legs, torsos), and non-biological handlike stimuli such as robotic hands. The hand-preferring region responded most strongly to hands, followed by robotic hands, fingers, and feet, whereas its response to assorted body parts did not significantly differ from baseline. By contrast, EBA responded most strongly to body parts, followed by hands and feet, and did not significantly respond to robotic hands or fingers. Together, these results provide evidence for a representation of the hand in extrastriate visual cortex that is distinct from the representation of other body parts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20393066      PMCID: PMC2888254          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00215.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  49 in total

1.  Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion.

Authors:  E Grossman; M Donnelly; R Price; D Pickens; V Morgan; G Neighbor; R Blake
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex.

Authors:  G McCarthy; A Puce; A Belger; T Allison
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Anatomic constraints on cognitive theories of category specificity.

Authors:  J T Devlin; C J Moore; C J Mummery; M L Gorno-Tempini; J A Phillips; U Noppeney; R S J Frackowiak; K J Friston; C J Price
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge.

Authors:  A Martin; C L Wiggs; L G Ungerleider; J V Haxby
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Prosopagnosia: anatomic basis and behavioral mechanisms.

Authors:  A R Damasio; H Damasio; G W Van Hoesen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex.

Authors:  R Malach; J B Reppas; R R Benson; K K Kwong; H Jiang; W A Kennedy; P J Ledden; T J Brady; B R Rosen; R B Tootell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Visual receptive fields of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the monkey.

Authors:  C G Gross; D B Bender; C E Rocha-Miranda
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Abnormal face identity coding in the middle fusiform gyrus of two brain-damaged prosopagnosic patients.

Authors:  Jennifer Steeves; Laurence Dricot; Herbert C Goltz; Bettina Sorger; Judith Peters; A David Milner; Melvyn A Goodale; Rainer Goebel; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  FMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp; Kathryn E Lee; James V Haxby; Alex Martin
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Functional MRI analysis of body and body part representations in the extrastriate and fusiform body areas.

Authors:  John C Taylor; Alison J Wiggett; Paul E Downing
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  42 in total

1.  Event-related repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of posterior superior temporal sulcus improves the detection of threatening postural changes in human bodies.

Authors:  Matteo Candidi; Bernard M C Stienen; Salvatore Maria Aglioti; Beatrice de Gelder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The putative visual word form area is functionally connected to the dorsal attention network.

Authors:  Alecia C Vogel; Fran M Miezin; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Brain regions involved in human movement perception: a quantitative voxel-based meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Grosbras; Susan Beaton; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Network activity underlying the illusory self-attribution of a dummy arm.

Authors:  Jakub Limanowski; Felix Blankenburg
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Grasping performance depends upon the richness of hand feedback.

Authors:  Prajith Sivakumar; Derek J Quinlan; Kevin M Stubbs; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Hands in motion: an upper-limb-selective area in the occipitotemporal cortex shows sensitivity to viewed hand kinematics.

Authors:  Tanya Orlov; Yuval Porat; Tamar R Makin; Ehud Zohary
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Are depictive gestures like pictures? commonalities and differences in semantic processing.

Authors:  Ying Choon Wu; Seana Coulson
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  The Representation of Object-Directed Action and Function Knowledge in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Quanjing Chen; Frank E Garcea; Bradford Z Mahon
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Distinct Functional and Structural Connectivity of the Human Hand-Knob Supported by Intraoperative Findings.

Authors:  Luciano Simone; Luca Viganò; Luca Fornia; Henrietta Howells; Antonella Leonetti; Guglielmo Puglisi; Andrea Bellacicca; Lorenzo Bello; Gabriella Cerri
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Function in the human connectome: task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Gregory C Burgess; Michael P Harms; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar; Maurizio Corbetta; Matthew F Glasser; Sandra Curtiss; Sachin Dixit; Cindy Feldt; Dan Nolan; Edward Bryant; Tucker Hartley; Owen Footer; James M Bjork; Russ Poldrack; Steve Smith; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Abraham Z Snyder; David C Van Essen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.