Literature DB >> 24403156

Distinct neural mechanisms for body form and body motion discriminations.

Joris Vangeneugden1, Marius V Peelen, Duje Tadin, Lorella Battelli.   

Abstract

Actions can be understood based on form cues (e.g., static body posture) as well as motion cues (e.g., gait patterns). A fundamental debate centers on the question of whether the functional and neural mechanisms processing these two types of cues are dissociable. Here, using fMRI, psychophysics, and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), all within the same human participants, we show that mechanisms underlying body form and body motion processing are functionally and neurally distinct. Multivoxel fMRI activity patterns in the extrastriate body area (EBA), but not in the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), carried cue invariant information about the body form of an acting human. Conversely, multivoxel patterns in pSTS, but not in EBA, carried information about the body motion of the same actor. In a psychophysical experiment, we selectively impaired body form and body motion discriminations by manipulating different visual cues: misaligning the ellipses that made up a dynamic walker stimulus selectively disrupted body form discriminations, while varying the presentation duration of the walker selectively affected body motion discriminations. Finally, a TMS experiment revealed causal evidence for a double-dissociation between neural mechanisms underlying body form and body motion discriminations: TMS over EBA selectively disrupted body form discrimination, whereas TMS over pSTS selectively disrupted body motion discrimination. Together, these findings reveal complementing but dissociable functions of EBA and pSTS during action perception. They provide constraints for theoretical and computational models of action perception by showing that action perception involves at least two parallel pathways that separately contribute to the understanding of others' behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biological motion; extrastriate cortex; form vs motion; functional imaging; transcranial magnetic imaging; visual processing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24403156      PMCID: PMC6608149          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4032-13.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  65 in total

1.  Activation in human MT/MST by static images with implied motion.

Authors:  Z Kourtzi; N Kanwisher
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion.

Authors:  E Grossman; M Donnelly; R Price; D Pickens; V Morgan; G Neighbor; R Blake
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Object-selective responses in the human motion area MT/MST.

Authors:  Zoe Kourtzi; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Michael Erb; Wolfgang Grodd
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Brain Areas Active during Visual Perception of Biological Motion.

Authors:  Emily D Grossman; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  What constitutes an efficient reference frame for vision?

Authors:  Duje Tadin; Joseph S Lappin; Randolph Blake; Emily D Grossman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Retinotopy and functional subdivision of human areas MT and MST.

Authors:  Alexander C Huk; Robert F Dougherty; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The distributed human neural system for face perception.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body.

Authors:  P E Downing; Y Jiang; M Shuman; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Perception of biological motion without local image motion.

Authors:  J A Beintema; M Lappe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  25 in total

1.  Heritable aspects of biological motion perception and its covariation with autistic traits.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Li Wang; Qian Xu; Dong Liu; Lihong Chen; Nikolaus F Troje; Sheng He; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  One object, two networks? Assessing the relationship between the face and body-selective regions in the primate visual system.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; J Brendan Ritchie; Leslie G Ungerleider; Christopher I Baker
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.270

3.  Social-affective features drive human representations of observed actions.

Authors:  Diana C Dima; Tyler M Tomita; Christopher J Honey; Leyla Isik
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 8.713

4.  Heads First: Visual Aftereffects Reveal Hierarchical Integration of Cues to Social Attention.

Authors:  Sarah Cooney; Holly Dignam; Nuala Brady
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Left occipitotemporal cortex contributes to the discrimination of tool-associated hand actions: fMRI and TMS evidence.

Authors:  Francesca Perini; Alfonso Caramazza; Marius V Peelen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Perception of biological motion from size-invariant body representations.

Authors:  Markus Lappe; Karin Wittinghofer; Marc H E de Lussanet
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-24

7.  Action verbs are processed differently in metaphorical and literal sentences depending on the semantic match of visual primes.

Authors:  Melissa Troyer; Lauren B Curley; Luke E Miller; Ayse P Saygin; Benjamin K Bergen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Do People "Pop Out"?

Authors:  Katja M Mayer; Quoc C Vuong; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Body form and body motion processing are dissociable in the visual pathways.

Authors:  Paddy D Ross
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-21

10.  The Extrastriate Body Area Computes Desired Goal States during Action Planning.

Authors:  Marius Zimmermann; Lennart Verhagen; Floris P de Lange; Ivan Toni
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-04-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.