Literature DB >> 23435213

Probabilistic atlases for face and biological motion perception: an analysis of their reliability and overlap.

Andrew D Engell1, Gregory McCarthy.   

Abstract

Neuroimaging research has identified several category-selective regions in visual cortex that respond most strongly when viewing an exemplar image from a preferred category, such as faces. Recent studies, however, have suggested a more complex pattern of activation that has been heretofore unrecognized, e.g., the presence of additional patches of activation to faces beyond the well-studied fusiform face area, and the activation of ostensible face selective regions by animate motion of non-biological forms. Here, we characterize the spatial pattern of brain activity evoked by viewing faces or biological motion in large fMRI samples (N>120). We create probabilistic atlases for both face and biological motion activation, and directly compare their spatial patterns of activation. Our findings support the suggestion that the fusiform face area is composed of at least two separable foci of activation. The face-evoked response in the fusiform and nearby ventral temporal cortex has good reliability across runs; however, we found surprisingly high variability in lateral brain regions by faces, and for all brain regions by biological motion, which had an overall much lower effect size. We found that faces and biological motion evoke substantially overlapping activation distributions in both ventral and lateral occipitotemporal cortices. The peaks of activation for these different categories within these overlapping regions were close but distinct.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23435213      PMCID: PMC3690657          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  75 in total

1.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. III: Effects of top-down processing on face-specific potentials.

Authors:  A Puce; T Allison; G McCarthy
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion.

Authors:  E Grossman; M Donnelly; R Price; D Pickens; V Morgan; G Neighbor; R Blake
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  J Sergent; S Ohta; B MacDonald
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Facial-expression and gaze-selective responses in the monkey amygdala.

Authors:  Kari L Hoffman; Katalin M Gothard; Michael C Schmid; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Distributed representations of dynamic facial expressions in the superior temporal sulcus.

Authors:  Christopher P Said; Christopher D Moore; Andrew D Engell; Alexander Todorov; James V Haxby
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  J V Haxby; M I Gobbini; M L Furey; A Ishai; J L Schouten; P Pietrini
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Grasping the intentions of others: the perceived intentionality of an action influences activity in the superior temporal sulcus during social perception.

Authors:  Kevin A Pelphrey; James P Morris; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  FMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp; Kathryn E Lee; James V Haxby; Alex Martin
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Perception of face parts and face configurations: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Jia Liu; Alison Harris; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 10.  The neural basis of visual body perception.

Authors:  Marius V Peelen; Paul E Downing
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 34.870

View more
  28 in total

1.  Holistic versus feature-based binding in the medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Rebecca N van den Honert; Gregory McCarthy; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Functional Heterogeneity and Convergence in the Right Temporoparietal Junction.

Authors:  Su Mei Lee; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Structural and effective brain connectivity underlying biological motion detection.

Authors:  Arseny A Sokolov; Peter Zeidman; Michael Erb; Philippe Ryvlin; Karl J Friston; Marina A Pavlova
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Stimulus-induced reversal of information flow through a cortical network for animacy perception.

Authors:  Sarah Shultz; Rebecca N van den Honert; Andrew D Engell; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Functional integration of the posterior superior temporal sulcus correlates with facial expression recognition.

Authors:  Xu Wang; Yiying Song; Zonglei Zhen; Jia Liu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Category representations in the brain are both discretely localized and widely distributed.

Authors:  Zarrar Shehzad; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Perceived animacy influences the processing of human-like surface features in the fusiform gyrus.

Authors:  Sarah Shultz; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 8.  Beyond the FFA: The role of the ventral anterior temporal lobes in face processing.

Authors:  Jessica A Collins; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Robust selectivity for faces in the human amygdala in the absence of expressions.

Authors:  Peter Mende-Siedlecki; Sara C Verosky; Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Alexander Todorov
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 10.  Monkey cortex through fMRI glasses.

Authors:  Wim Vanduffel; Qi Zhu; Guy A Orban
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.