Literature DB >> 21437854

Systematic literature review and pooled analyses of risk factors for finding adenomas at surveillance colonoscopy.

V de Jonge1, J Sint Nicolaas, M E van Leerdam, E J Kuipers, S J O Veldhuyzen van Zanten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines recommend surveillance after polypectomy. There is variation in the surveillance intervals that are being advised. This variation also affects adherence. Surveillance intervals need to be based on risk factors at index. We therefore aimed to systematically review risk factors of adenoma findings at surveillance colonoscopy.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed up to September 2009. Studies that reported on follow-up colonoscopy findings with stratification for index characteristics were included. Pooled relative risks (RR) were calculated using random effects models, and heterogeneity was determined by means of the I2-statistic.
RESULTS: A total of 27 studies met the inclusion criteria. The most important risk factors for adenoma findings were the presence on index colonoscopy of the following: advanced adenomas (RR: 1.81), ≥ 3 adenomas (RR: 1.64), size ≥ 10 mm (RR: 1.66), and age ≥ 60 years (RR: 1.65). The presence of villous adenomas, high grade dysplasia, proximal adenomas, and male gender were associated with less profound increases in RR. Marked variation in study design and substantial heterogeneity between studies was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Convincing evidence exists that patients with advanced adenomas, ≥ 3 adenomas, adenomas ≥ 10 mm, or age ≥ 60 years have an increased risk of adenoma recurrence. The evidence for other baseline findings for an increased risk of adenoma recurrence is inconclusive. Marked variation and consistently lower RRs in studies of medium or low quality emphasize the necessity for well performed and well reported studies. Given the high impact of surveillance on patients and service providers, there is need for further assessment of the risk(s) of adenoma recurrence. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21437854     DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  20 in total

1.  Urinary prostaglandin E2 metabolite and risk for colorectal adenoma.

Authors:  Martha J Shrubsole; Qiuyin Cai; Wanqing Wen; Ginger Milne; Walter E Smalley; Zhi Chen; Reid M Ness; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-12-13

2.  Risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer due to incomplete adenoma resection: A nationwide, population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Tim Dg Belderbos; Hendrikus Jm Pullens; Max Leenders; Marguerite Ei Schipper; Peter D Siersema; Martijn Gh van Oijen
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.623

3.  Recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large rectal adenomas.

Authors:  Marco Ettore Allaix; Alberto Arezzo; Paola Cassoni; Federico Famiglietti; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Surveillance of colonic polyps: Are we getting it right?

Authors:  Stewart N Bonnington; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  The 'natural history' of declined outpatient gastroenterology referrals.

Authors:  Emelie M de Boer; David Pincock; Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.522

6.  Risk of Metachronous Advanced Neoplasia in Patients With Multiple Diminutive Adenomas.

Authors:  Jung Yoon Kim; Tae Jun Kim; Sun-Young Baek; Soohyun Ahn; Eun Ran Kim; Sung Noh Hong; Dong Kyung Chang; Young-Ho Kim
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Association between adenoma location and risk of recurrence.

Authors:  Heiko Pohl; Douglas J Robertson; Leila A Mott; Dennis J Ahnen; Carol A Burke; Elizabeth L Barry; Robert S Bresalier; Jane C Figueiredo; Aasma Shaukat; Robert S Sandler; John A Baron
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  The appropriateness of surveillance colonoscopy intervals after polypectomy.

Authors:  Eline Schreuders; Jerome Sint Nicolaas; Vincent de Jonge; Harmke van Kooten; Isaac Soo; Daniel Sadowski; Clarence Wong; Monique E van Leerdam; Ernst J Kuipers; Sander J O Veldhuyzen van Zanten
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.522

9.  Adenocarcinomas After Prophylactic Surgery For Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.

Authors:  Joan C Smith; Michael W Schäffer; Billy R Ballard; Duane T Smoot; Alan J Herline; Samuel E Adunyah; Amosy E M'Koma
Journal:  J Cancer Ther       Date:  2013

10.  Associations between circulating 1,25(OH)₂D concentration and odds of metachronous colorectal adenoma.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hibler; Christine L Sardo Molmenti; Peter Lance; Peter W Jurutka; Elizabeth T Jacobs
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.