Heiko Pohl1, Douglas J Robertson1, Leila A Mott2, Dennis J Ahnen3, Carol A Burke4, Elizabeth L Barry2, Robert S Bresalier5, Jane C Figueiredo6, Aasma Shaukat7, Robert S Sandler8, John A Baron8. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado. 4. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. 5. Department of Gastroenterology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 6. Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. 7. Section of Gastroenterology, Minneapolis VAHCS and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 8. Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The biological environment varies across the colorectum and may therefore affect neoplastic growth differently in the proximal and distal colon. The aim of the study was to evaluate the risk for recurrent adenomas and their anatomic location based on adenoma location at baseline colonoscopy. METHODS: Data were extracted from 3 adenoma prevention trials (n = 2430). Participants had at least 1 adenoma at baseline colonoscopy and underwent subsequent surveillance colonoscopy, at which time metachronous adenomas could be detected. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for metachronous adenomas by location of the baseline lesion and considered the impact of advanced neoplasia and multiplicity. RESULTS: At baseline, 522 patients (21.5%) had adenomas only in the proximal colon, 1266 patients (52.1%) had adenomas only in the distal colorectum, and 642 (26.4%) had adenomas in both regions. Overall, 877 patients (36.5%) had metachronous adenomas during the follow-up period. Those with only proximal adenomas at baseline had a higher risk of metachronous adenomas compared with patients with only distal adenomas (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.01-1.35). A greater proximal risk was found after restricting the analysis to patients with multiple proximal adenomas versus multiple distal adenomas (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.10-1.67). The risk of recurrent adenomas on the same side was 48% higher for patients with only proximal adenomas at baseline compared with those with only distal adenomas at baseline (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.22-1.80). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with proximal adenomas only have a modestly greater risk of adenoma recurrence than patients with adenomas limited to the distal colon, and have a greater likelihood of adenoma recurrence on the same side compared with patients with distal adenomas. This observation suggests that biological factors may differentially affect neoplasia growth across the colon. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The biological environment varies across the colorectum and may therefore affect neoplastic growth differently in the proximal and distal colon. The aim of the study was to evaluate the risk for recurrent adenomas and their anatomic location based on adenoma location at baseline colonoscopy. METHODS: Data were extracted from 3 adenoma prevention trials (n = 2430). Participants had at least 1 adenoma at baseline colonoscopy and underwent subsequent surveillance colonoscopy, at which time metachronous adenomas could be detected. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for metachronous adenomas by location of the baseline lesion and considered the impact of advanced neoplasia and multiplicity. RESULTS: At baseline, 522 patients (21.5%) had adenomas only in the proximal colon, 1266 patients (52.1%) had adenomas only in the distal colorectum, and 642 (26.4%) had adenomas in both regions. Overall, 877 patients (36.5%) had metachronous adenomas during the follow-up period. Those with only proximal adenomas at baseline had a higher risk of metachronous adenomas compared with patients with only distal adenomas (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.01-1.35). A greater proximal risk was found after restricting the analysis to patients with multiple proximal adenomas versus multiple distal adenomas (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.10-1.67). The risk of recurrent adenomas on the same side was 48% higher for patients with only proximal adenomas at baseline compared with those with only distal adenomas at baseline (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.22-1.80). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with proximal adenomas only have a modestly greater risk of adenoma recurrence than patients with adenomas limited to the distal colon, and have a greater likelihood of adenoma recurrence on the same side compared with patients with distal adenomas. This observation suggests that biological factors may differentially affect neoplasia growth across the colon. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: John A Baron; Bernard F Cole; Robert S Sandler; Robert W Haile; Dennis Ahnen; Robert Bresalier; Gail McKeown-Eyssen; Robert W Summers; Richard Rothstein; Carol A Burke; Dale C Snover; Timothy R Church; John I Allen; Michael Beach; Gerald J Beck; John H Bond; Tim Byers; E Robert Greenberg; Jack S Mandel; Norman Marcon; Leila A Mott; Loretta Pearson; Fred Saibil; Rosalind U van Stolk Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Gwen Murphy; Paul S Albert; Leah B Sansbury; Zhuoqiao Wang; Amanda J Cross; Pamela M Marcus; Bette Caan; James R Marshall; Peter Lance; Electra D Paskett; Joel Weissfeld; Martha L Slattery; Randall Burt; Frank Iber; Moshe Shike; J Walter Kikendall; Elaine Lanza; Arthur Schatzkin Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-03-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: J A Baron; M Beach; J S Mandel; R U van Stolk; R W Haile; R S Sandler; R Rothstein; R W Summers; D C Snover; G J Beck; J H Bond; E R Greenberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-01-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Samir Gupta; David Lieberman; Joseph C Anderson; Carol A Burke; Jason A Dominitz; Tonya Kaltenbach; Douglas J Robertson; Aasma Shaukat; Sapna Syngal; Douglas K Rex Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2020-02-07 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Samir Gupta; David Lieberman; Joseph C Anderson; Carol A Burke; Jason A Dominitz; Tonya Kaltenbach; Douglas J Robertson; Aasma Shaukat; Sapna Syngal; Douglas K Rex Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2020-02-07 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Samir Gupta; David Lieberman; Joseph C Anderson; Carol A Burke; Jason A Dominitz; Tonya Kaltenbach; Douglas J Robertson; Aasma Shaukat; Sapna Syngal; Douglas K Rex Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 12.045
Authors: Rhea Harewood; Kate Wooldrage; Emma C Robbins; James Kinross; Christian von Wagner; Amanda J Cross Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 9.075