Literature DB >> 21436145

The impact of taxon sampling on phylogenetic inference: a review of two decades of controversy.

Ahmed Ragab Nabhan1, Indra Neil Sarkar.   

Abstract

Over the past two decades, there has been a long-standing debate about the impact of taxon sampling on phylogenetic inference. Studies have been based on both real and simulated data sets, within actual and theoretical contexts, and using different inference methods, to study the impact of taxon sampling. In some cases, conflicting conclusions have been drawn for the same data set. The main questions explored in studies to date have been about the effects of using sparse data, adding new taxa, including more characters from genome sequences and using different (or concatenated) locus regions. These questions can be reduced to more fundamental ones about the assessment of data quality and the design guidelines of taxon sampling in phylogenetic inference experiments. This review summarizes progress to date in understanding the impact of taxon sampling on the accuracy of phylogenetic analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21436145      PMCID: PMC3251835          DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbr014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  72 in total

1.  Taxon sampling revisited.

Authors:  S Poe; D L Swofford
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-03-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  M S Rosenberg; S Kumar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology.

Authors:  J P Huelsenbeck; F Ronquist; R Nielsen; J P Bollback
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Effects of nucleotide composition bias on the success of the parsimony criterion in phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  G C Conant; P O Lewis
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Large-scale phylogenies and measuring the performance of phylogenetic estimators.

Authors:  J Kim
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: an empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for angiosperms.

Authors:  D E Soltis; P S Soltis; M E Mort; M W Chase; V Savolainen; S B Hoot; C M Morton
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and investigator bias.

Authors:  D M Hillis
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 15.683

8.  Sensitivity of phylogeny estimation to taxonomic sampling.

Authors:  S Poe
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 15.683

9.  Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem?

Authors:  A Graybeal
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 15.683

10.  The evolutionary position of nematodes.

Authors:  Jaime E Blair; Kazuho Ikeo; Takashi Gojobori; S Blair Hedges
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2002-04-08       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  43 in total

1.  A test of Darwin's naturalization hypothesis in the thistle tribe shows that close relatives make bad neighbors.

Authors:  Daniel S Park; Daniel Potter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Revised Phylogeny of the Cellulose Synthase Gene Superfamily: Insights into Cell Wall Evolution.

Authors:  Alan Little; Julian G Schwerdt; Neil J Shirley; Shi F Khor; Kylie Neumann; Lisa A O'Donovan; Jelle Lahnstein; Helen M Collins; Marilyn Henderson; Geoffrey B Fincher; Rachel A Burton
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-05-20       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Phylogenetic uncertainty and the inference of patterns in community ecology and comparative studies.

Authors:  Vanderlei J Debastiani; Vinicius A G Bastazini; Valério D Pillar
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Mitochondrial Genomes Provide New Phylogenetic and Evolutionary Insights into Psilidae (Diptera: Brachycera).

Authors:  Jiale Zhou; Ding Yang
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Phylogenomic Analysis Reconstructed the Order Matoniales from Paleopolyploidy Veil.

Authors:  Jiang-Ping Shu; Hao Wang; Hui Shen; Rui-Jiang Wang; Qiang Fu; Yong-Dong Wang; Yuan-Nian Jiao; Yue-Hong Yan
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-07

6.  A Linear Time Solution to the Labeled Robinson-Foulds Distance Problem.

Authors:  Samuel Briand; Christophe Dessimoz; Nadia El-Mabrouk; Yannis Nevers
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 9.160

7.  Primate phylogenetic relationships and divergence dates inferred from complete mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  Luca Pozzi; Jason A Hodgson; Andrew S Burrell; Kirstin N Sterner; Ryan L Raaum; Todd R Disotell
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 4.286

8.  How to handle speciose clades? Mass taxon-sampling as a strategy towards illuminating the natural history of Campanula (Campanuloideae).

Authors:  Guilhem Mansion; Gerald Parolly; Andrew A Crowl; Evgeny Mavrodiev; Nico Cellinese; Marine Oganesian; Katharina Fraunhofer; Georgia Kamari; Dimitrios Phitos; Rosemarie Haberle; Galip Akaydin; Nursel Ikinci; Thomas Raus; Thomas Borsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Origin and evolution of protein fold designs inferred from phylogenomic analysis of CATH domain structures in proteomes.

Authors:  Syed Abbas Bukhari; Gustavo Caetano-Anollés
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Integrated fossil and molecular data reveal the biogeographic diversification of the eastern Asian-eastern North American disjunct hickory genus (Carya Nutt.).

Authors:  Jing-Bo Zhang; Rui-Qi Li; Xiao-Guo Xiang; Steven R Manchester; Li Lin; Wei Wang; Jun Wen; Zhi-Duan Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.