Literature DB >> 12064239

Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: an empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for angiosperms.

D E Soltis1, P S Soltis, M E Mort, M W Chase, V Savolainen, S B Hoot, C M Morton.   

Abstract

To explore the feasibility of parsimony analysis for large data sets, we conducted heuristic parsimony searches and bootstrap analyses on separate and combined DNA data sets for 190 angiosperms and three outgroups. Separate data sets of 18S rDNA (1,855 bp), rbcL (1,428 bp), and atpB (1,450 bp) sequences were combined into a single matrix 4,733 bp in length. Analyses of the combined data set show great improvements in computer run times compared to those of the separate data sets and of the data sets combined in pairs. Six searches of the 18S rDNA + rbcL + atpB data set were conducted; in all cases TBR branch swapping was completed, generally within a few days. In contrast, TBR branch swapping was not completed for any of the three separate data sets, or for the pairwise combined data sets. These results illustrate that it is possible to conduct a thorough search of tree space with large data sets, given sufficient signal. In this case, and probably most others, sufficient signal for a large number of taxa can only be obtained by combining data sets. The combined data sets also have higher internal support for clades than the separate data sets, and more clades receive bootstrap support of > or = 50% in the combined analysis than in analyses of the separate data sets. These data suggest that one solution to the computational and analytical dilemmas posed by large data sets is the addition of nucleotides, as well as taxa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 12064239     DOI: 10.1080/106351598261012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  12 in total

Review 1.  Contributions of plant molecular systematics to studies of molecular evolution.

Authors:  E D Soltis; P S Soltis
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 2.  Progress in understanding angiosperm history, success, and relationships: Darwin's abominably "perplexing phenomenon".

Authors:  W L Crepet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The root of the angiosperms revisited.

Authors:  Michael J Zanis; Douglas E Soltis; Pamela S Soltis; Sarah Mathews; Michael J Donoghue
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Using plastid genome-scale data to resolve enigmatic relationships among basal angiosperms.

Authors:  Michael J Moore; Charles D Bell; Pamela S Soltis; Douglas E Soltis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The evolution and loss of oil-offering flowers: new insights from dated phylogenies for angiosperms and bees.

Authors:  S S Renner; H Schaefer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  The impact of taxon sampling on phylogenetic inference: a review of two decades of controversy.

Authors:  Ahmed Ragab Nabhan; Indra Neil Sarkar
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 11.622

7.  Early Cretaceous lineages of monocot flowering plants.

Authors:  K Bremer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Darwin's abominable mystery: Insights from a supertree of the angiosperms.

Authors:  T Jonathan Davies; Timothy G Barraclough; Mark W Chase; Pamela S Soltis; Douglas E Soltis; Vincent Savolainen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Highly incomplete taxa can rescue phylogenetic analyses from the negative impacts of limited taxon sampling.

Authors:  John J Wiens; Jonathan Tiu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Ancient flowering plants: DNA sequences and angiosperm classification.

Authors:  M W Chase; M F Fay
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2001-03-22       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.