Literature DB >> 12064237

Sensitivity of phylogeny estimation to taxonomic sampling.

S Poe1.   

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that addition or deletion of taxa from a data matrix can change the estimate of phylogeny. I used 29 data sets from the literature to examine the effect of taxon sampling on phylogeny estimation within data sets. I then used multiple regression to assess the effect of number of taxa, number of characters, homoplasy, strength of support, and tree symmetry on the sensitivity of data sets to taxonomic sampling. Sensitivity to sampling was measured by mapping characters from a matrix of culled taxa onto optimal trees for that reduced matrix and onto the pruned optimal tree for the entire matrix, then comparing the length of the reduced tree to the length of the pruned complete tree. Within-data-set patterns can be described by a second-order equation relating fraction of taxa sampled to sensitivity to sampling. Multiple regression analyses found number of taxa to be a significant predictor of sensitivity to sampling; retention index, number of informative characters, total support index, and tree symmetry were nonsignificant predictors. I derived a predictive regression equation relating fraction of taxa sampled and number of taxa potentially sampled to sensitivity to taxonomic sampling and calculated values for this equation within the bounds of the variables examined. The length difference between the complete tree and a subsampled tree was generally small (average difference of 0-2.9 steps), indicating that subsampling taxa is probably not an important problem for most phylogenetic analyses using up to 20 taxa.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 12064237     DOI: 10.1080/106351598261003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  17 in total

1.  Phylogeny of the Acanthocephala based on morphological characters.

Authors:  S Monks
Journal:  Syst Parasitol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.431

2.  Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  M S Rosenberg; S Kumar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Novel kingdom-level eukaryotic diversity in anoxic environments.

Authors:  Scott C Dawson; Norman R Pace
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Increased taxon sampling is advantageous for phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  David D Pollock; Derrick J Zwickl; Jimmy A McGuire; David M Hillis
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  Life history evolution and genome size in subtribe Oncidiinae (Orchidaceae).

Authors:  Mark W Chase; Lynda Hanson; Victor A Albert; W Mark Whitten; Norris H Williams
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 6.  Statistical measures of uncertainty for branches in phylogenetic trees inferred from molecular sequences by using model-based methods.

Authors:  Borys Wróbel
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The impact of taxon sampling on phylogenetic inference: a review of two decades of controversy.

Authors:  Ahmed Ragab Nabhan; Indra Neil Sarkar
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 11.622

8.  The effect of branch lengths on phylogeny: an empirical study using highly conserved orthologs from mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Austin L Hughes; Robert Friedman
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 4.286

9.  New perspective on uncultured bacterial phylogenetic division OP11.

Authors:  J Kirk Harris; Scott T Kelley; Norman R Pace
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Phylogenetic analysis of genome rearrangements among five mammalian orders.

Authors:  Haiwei Luo; William Arndt; Yiwei Zhang; Guanqun Shi; Max A Alekseyev; Jijun Tang; Austin L Hughes; Robert Friedman
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 4.286

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.