Literature DB >> 21430160

Recalibration of auditory space following milliseconds of cross-modal discrepancy.

David R Wozny1, Ladan Shams.   

Abstract

Basic features of objects and events in the environment such as timing and spatial location are encoded by multiple sensory modalities. This redundancy in sensory coding allows recalibration of one sense by other senses if there is a conflict between the sensory maps (Radeau and Bertelson, 1974; Zwiers et al., 2003; Navarra et al., 2009). In contrast to motor or sensorimotor adaptation, which can be relatively rapid, cross-sensory recalibration (the change in an isolated sensory representation after exposure to conflicting cross-modal information) has been reported only as a result of an extensive amount of exposure to sensory discrepancy (e.g., hundreds or thousands of trials, or prolonged durations). Therefore, sensory recalibration has traditionally been associated with compensation for permanent changes that would occur during development or after traumatic injuries or stroke. Nonetheless, the dynamics of sensory recalibration is unknown, and it is unclear whether prolonged inconsistency is required to trigger recalibration or whether such mechanisms are continuously engaged in self-maintenance. We show that in humans recalibration of perceived auditory space by vision can occur after a single exposure to discrepant auditory-visual stimuli lasting only a few milliseconds. These findings suggest an impressive degree of plasticity in a basic perceptual map induced by a cross-modal error signal. Therefore, it appears that modification of sensory maps does not necessarily require accumulation of a substantial amount of evidence of error to be triggered, and is continuously operational. This scheme of sensory recalibration has many advantages. It only requires a small working memory capacity, and allows rapid adaptation to transient changes in the environment as well as the body.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21430160      PMCID: PMC3071751          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6079-10.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  22 in total

1.  The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration.

Authors:  David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  First-trial adaptation to prism exposure.

Authors:  Gordon M Redding; Benjamin Wallace
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Rapidly induced auditory plasticity: the ventriloquism aftereffect.

Authors:  G H Recanzone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The after-effects of ventriloquism.

Authors:  M Radeau; P Bertelson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Intermodality inconsistency of input and directed attention as determinants of the nature of adaptation.

Authors:  L K Canon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-04

7.  Relearning sound localization with new ears.

Authors:  P M Hofman; J G Van Riswick; A J Van Opstal
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Probability matching as a computational strategy used in perception.

Authors:  David R Wozny; Ulrik R Beierholm; Ladan Shams
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity.

Authors:  Waka Fujisaki; Shinsuke Shimojo; Makio Kashino; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-06-13       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Plasticity in human sound localization induced by compressed spatial vision.

Authors:  Marcel P Zwiers; A John Van Opstal; Gary D Paige
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  54 in total

1.  Optimal visual-vestibular integration under conditions of conflicting intersensory motion profiles.

Authors:  John S Butler; Jennifer L Campos; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Alterations to multisensory and unisensory integration by stimulus competition.

Authors:  Scott R Pluta; Benjamin A Rowland; Terrence R Stanford; Barry E Stein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Clarifying some findings regarding the ventriloquist aftereffect.

Authors:  Andrew V Frane; Ladan Shams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  On recent findings and clarifications regarding the ventriloquist aftereffect.

Authors:  Catarina Mendonça; Steven van de Par; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Psychophysics and neuronal bases of sound localization in humans.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Norbert Kopčo; Iiro P Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Relearning auditory spectral cues for locations inside and outside the visual field.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Toby Blackman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-12-04

7.  Multisensory simultaneity recalibration: storage of the aftereffect in the absence of counterevidence.

Authors:  Tonja-Katrin Machulla; Massimiliano Di Luca; Eva Froehlich; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Spatial receptive field shift by preceding cross-modal stimulation in the cat superior colliculus.

Authors:  Jinghong Xu; Tingting Bi; Jing Wu; Fanzhu Meng; Kun Wang; Jiawei Hu; Xiao Han; Jiping Zhang; Xiaoming Zhou; Les Keniston; Liping Yu
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Prior knowledge of spatiotemporal configuration facilitates crossmodal saccadic response : A TWIN analysis.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius; Farid I Kandil
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Spatial and frequency specificity of the ventriloquism aftereffect revisited.

Authors:  Patrick Bruns; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.