Literature DB >> 21428509

Temporal suppression of the click-evoked otoacoustic emission level-curve.

Sarah Verhulst1, James M Harte, Torsten Dau.   

Abstract

The click-evoked otoacoustic emission (CEOAE) level-curve grows linearly for clicks below 40-60 dB and saturates for higher inputs. This study investigates dynamic (i.e., time-dependent) features of the CEOAE level-curve by presenting a suppressor-click less than 8 ms before the test-click. An alteration of the CEOAE level-curve, designated here as temporal suppression, was observed within this time period, and was shown to depend on the levels and the temporal separation of the two clicks. Temporal suppression occurred for all four subjects tested, and resulted in a vertical offset from the unsuppressed level-curve for test-click levels greater than 50 dB peak-equivalent level (peSPL). Temporal suppression was greatest for suppressors presented 1-4 ms before the test click, and the magnitude and time scale of the effect were subject dependent. Temporal suppression was furthermore observed for the short- (i.e., 6-18 ms) and long-latency (i.e., 24-36 ms) regions of the CEOAE, indicating that temporal suppression similarly affects synchronized spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SSOAEs) and purely evoked CEOAE components. Overall, this study demonstrates that temporal suppression of the CEOAE level-curve reflects a dynamic process in human cochlear processing that works on a time scale of 0-10 ms.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21428509     DOI: 10.1121/1.3531930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Functional modeling of the human auditory brainstem response to broadband stimulation.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Hari M Bharadwaj; Golbarg Mehraei; Christopher A Shera; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  High frequency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission measurements using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Chelsea M Blankenship; Angela C Garinis; Daniel B Putterman; Marcin Wróblewski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Comparisons of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Nonlinear time-domain cochlear model for transient stimulation and human otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Torsten Dau; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Can a Static Nonlinearity Account for the Dynamics of Otoacoustic Emission Suppression?

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Christopher A Shera; James M Harte; Torsten Dau
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2011-11

6.  Asymmetry and Microstructure of Temporal-Suppression Patterns in Basilar-Membrane Responses to Clicks: Relation to Tonal Suppression and Traveling-Wave Dispersion.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Wei Dong; Alessandro Altoè; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-03-12

7.  Experimental evidence for a cochlear source of the precedence effect.

Authors:  Federica Bianchi; Sarah Verhulst; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-08-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.