Literature DB >> 12522188

Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. IV. Influence of visual rotational cues during roll optokinetic stimuli.

L H Zupan1, D M Merfeld.   

Abstract

Sensory systems often provide ambiguous information. For example, otolith organs measure gravito-inertial force (GIF), the sum of gravitational force and inertial force due to linear acceleration. However, according to Einstein's equivalence principle, a change in gravitational force due to tilt is indistinguishable from a change in inertial force due to translation. Therefore the central nervous system (CNS) must use other sensory cues to distinguish tilt from translation. For example, the CNS might use dynamic visual cues indicating rotation to help determine the orientation of gravity (tilt). This, in turn, might influence the neural processes that estimate linear acceleration, since the CNS might estimate gravity and linear acceleration such that the difference between these estimates matches the measured GIF. Depending on specific sensory information inflow, inaccurate estimates of gravity and linear acceleration can occur. Specifically, we predict that illusory tilt caused by roll optokinetic cues should lead to a horizontal vestibuloocular reflex compensatory for an interaural estimate of linear acceleration, even in the absence of actual linear acceleration. To investigate these predictions, we measured eye movements binocularly using infrared video methods in 17 subjects during and after optokinetic stimulation about the subject's nasooccipital (roll) axis (60 degrees /s, clockwise or counterclockwise). The optokinetic stimulation was applied for 60 s followed by 30 s in darkness. We simultaneously measured subjective roll tilt using a somatosensory bar. Each subject was tested in three different orientations: upright, pitched forward 10 degrees, and pitched backward 10 degrees. Five subjects reported significant subjective roll tilt (>10 degrees ) in directions consistent with the direction of the optokinetic stimulation. In addition to torsional optokinetic nystagmus and after nystagmus, we measured a horizontal nystagmus to the right during and following clockwise (CW) stimulation and to the left during and following counterclockwise (CCW) stimulation. These measurements match predictions that subjective tilt in the absence of real tilt should induce a nonzero estimate of interaural linear acceleration and, therefore, a horizontal eye response. Furthermore, as predicted, the horizontal response in the dark was larger for Tilters (n = 5) than for Non-Tilters (n = 12).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12522188     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00513.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  22 in total

1.  Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues.

Authors:  Andrew A Rader; Charles M Oman; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Roll rotation cues influence roll tilt perception assayed using a somatosensory technique.

Authors:  Sukyung Park; Claire Gianna-Poulin; F Owen Black; Scott Wood; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Subjective somatosensory vertical during dynamic tilt is dependent on task, inertial condition, and multisensory concordance.

Authors:  W G Wright; S Glasauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Multisensory integration: resolving sensory ambiguities to build novel representations.

Authors:  Andrea M Green; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 5.  Gravity estimation and verticality perception.

Authors:  Christopher J Dakin; Ari Rosenberg
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018

Review 6.  Computation of egomotion in the macaque cerebellar vermis.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Tatyana A Yakusheva; Andrea M Green; J David Dickman; Pablo M Blazquez
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  The initial torsional Ocular Following Response (tOFR) in humans: a response to the total motion energy in the stimulus?

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 8.  How vestibular neurons solve the tilt/translation ambiguity. Comparison of brainstem, cerebellum, and thalamus.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Tatyana A Yakusheva
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Roll tilt psychophysics in rhesus monkeys during vestibular and visual stimulation.

Authors:  Richard F Lewis; Csilla Haburcakova; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Interaural self-motion linear velocity thresholds are shifted by roll vection.

Authors:  Lionel H Zupan; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.