Literature DB >> 21421947

Adolescents' use of indoor tanning: a large-scale evaluation of psychosocial, environmental, and policy-level correlates.

Joni A Mayer1, Susan I Woodruff, Donald J Slymen, James F Sallis, Jean L Forster, Elizabeth J Clapp, Katherine D Hoerster, Latrice C Pichon, John R Weeks, George E Belch, Martin A Weinstock, Todd Gilmer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated psychosocial, built-environmental, and policy-related correlates of adolescents' indoor tanning use.
METHODS: We developed 5 discrete data sets in the 100 most populous US cities, based on interviews of 6125 adolescents (aged 14-17 years) and their parents, analysis of state indoor tanning laws, interviews with enforcement experts, computed density of tanning facilities, and evaluations of these 3399 facilities' practices regarding access by youths. After univariate analyses, we constructed multilevel models with generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs).
RESULTS: In the past year, 17.1% of girls and 3.2% of boys had used indoor tanning. The GLMMs indicated that several psychosocial or demographic variables significantly predicted use, including being female, older, and White; having a larger allowance and a parent who used indoor tanning and allowed their adolescent to use it; and holding certain beliefs about indoor tanning's consequences. Living within 2 miles of a tanning facility also was a significant predictor. Residing in a state with youth-access legislation was not significantly associated with use.
CONCLUSIONS: Current laws appear ineffective in reducing indoor tanning; bans likely are needed. Parents have an important role in prevention efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21421947      PMCID: PMC3076411          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  37 in total

1.  Compliance with federal and state legislation by indoor tanning facilities in San Diego.

Authors:  C A Culley; J A Mayer; L Eckhardt; A J Busic; L F Eichenfield; J F Sallis; P J Quintana; S I Woodruff
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  Indoor tanning facility density in eighty U.S. cities.

Authors:  Richard C Palmer; Joni A Mayer; Susan I Woodruff; Laura Eckhardt; James F Sallis
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2002-06

3.  Examination of the efficacy of an appearance-focused intervention to reduce UV exposure.

Authors:  Joel J Hillhouse; Rob Turrisi
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2002-08

4.  Use of indoor tanning facilities by white adolescents in the United States.

Authors:  Catherine A Demko; Elaine A Borawski; Sara M Debanne; Kevin D Cooper; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2003-09

5.  The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI.

Authors:  T B Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1988-06

6.  Youth access laws: in the dark at the tanning parlor?

Authors:  Robert P Dellavalle; Eva R Parker; Nancy Cersonsky; Eric J Hester; Bragg Hemme; Diane L Burkhardt; Alan K Chen; Lisa M Schilling
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2003-04

7.  FDA-sunlamp recommended Maximum Timer Interval And Exposure Schedule: consensus ISO/CIE dose equivalence.

Authors:  John C Dowdy; Eugene A Czako; Michael E Stepp; Steven C Schlitt; Gregory R Bender; Lateef U Khan; Kenneth D Shinneman; Manuel G Karos; James G Shepherd; Robert M Sayre
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  Use of sunscreen, sunburning rates, and tanning bed use among more than 10 000 US children and adolescents.

Authors:  Alan C Geller; Graham Colditz; Susan Oliveria; Karen Emmons; Cynthia Jorgensen; Gideon N Aweh; A Lindsay Frazier
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Use of indoor tanning sunlamps by US youth, ages 11-18 years, and by their parent or guardian caregivers: prevalence and correlates.

Authors:  Vilma E Cokkinides; Martin A Weinstock; Mary C O'Connell; Michael J Thun
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Characteristics associated with use or intention to use indoor tanning among adolescents.

Authors:  DeAnn Lazovich; Jean Forster; Glorian Sorensen; Karen Emmons; Jo Stryker; Marie-France Demierre; Andrea Hickle; Natania Remba
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2004-09
View more
  28 in total

1.  Comprehensive evaluation of indoor tanning regulations: a 50-state analysis, 2012.

Authors:  Bridget Gosis; Blake P Sampson; Andrew B Seidenberg; Sophie J Balk; Mark Gottlieb; Alan C Geller
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 8.551

2.  Using research data to impact consumer protection legislation: lessons learned from CITY100 dissemination efforts.

Authors:  Katherine D Hoerster; Joni A Mayer
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Psychosocial aspects associated with use of sunscreen, natural sunlight exposure, and artificial tanning.

Authors:  Jessica Ventenilla; Katlein França; Torello Lotti; Jonette Keri
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2017-02-08

Review 4.  New approaches to melanoma prevention.

Authors:  June K Robinson; Mary Kate Baker; Joel J Hillhouse
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 3.478

5.  State indoor tanning laws and adolescent indoor tanning.

Authors:  Gery P Guy; Zahava Berkowitz; Sherry Everett Jones; Emily O'Malley Olsen; Justin N Miyamoto; Shannon L Michael; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Health behaviours associated with indoor tanning based on the 2012/13 Manitoba Youth Health Survey.

Authors:  E Harland; J Griffith; H Lu; T Erickson; K Magsino
Journal:  Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  State of the science on prevention and screening to reduce melanoma incidence and mortality: The time is now.

Authors:  Mary K Tripp; Meg Watson; Sophie J Balk; Susan M Swetter; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Contextual factors, indoor tanning, and tanning dependence in young women.

Authors:  Carolyn J Heckman; Susan D Darlow; Jacqueline D Kloss; Teja Munshi; Sharon L Manne
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2015-05

9.  Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM) position statement: ban indoor tanning for minors.

Authors:  Sherry Pagoto; Joel Hillhouse; Carolyn J Heckman; Elliot J Coups; Jerod Stapleton; David Buller; Rob Turrisi; June Robinson; Alan C Geller
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Indoor tanning among high school students in the United States, 2009 and 2011.

Authors:  Gery P Guy; Zahava Berkowitz; Eric Tai; Dawn M Holman; Sherry Everett Jones; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 10.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.