Literature DB >> 28181031

Psychosocial aspects associated with use of sunscreen, natural sunlight exposure, and artificial tanning.

Jessica Ventenilla1, Katlein França2,3, Torello Lotti4, Jonette Keri5.   

Abstract

Natural and artificial tanning have become very popular in Western culture, yet at the same time, there is still a psychodermatology concern for this activity. Not much has been examined with the psychological aspects of tanning and sunscreen use. The purpose of this study is to examine the psychosocial effects associated with sun protection, natural, and artificial tanning among individuals 18 years old or older visiting the University of Miami Dermatology Outpatient Clinic. We distributed a survey on tanning and sunscreen use to 150 dermatology outpatients, hospital employees, and hospital visitors for three weeks during June/July 2015 asking about how often they tan, use sunscreen, and how they feel about this topic. Demographics, such as gender, ethnicity, and education were taken into consideration to examine the different responses in each category. Our results suggest that people's perception to tanning and sunscreen use have evolved over time. Most people in South Florida nowadays feel guilty when exposed to natural sunlight without sunscreen and do not tan frequently. The majority of the people, specifically women, utilize the recommended amount of sunscreen with a sun protection factor of 30-50. However, we can conclude that communication between social media and the general public can affect people's decision-making on tanning and sunscreen use with physician advice being the most effective method of encouraging people to use sunscreen. This study will add to the growing knowledge about psychodermatology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Psychodermatology; Psychology; Sunlight; Sunscreen; Tanning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28181031     DOI: 10.1007/s10354-017-0541-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5341


  15 in total

1.  A psychosocial model of sun protection and sunbathing in young women: the impact of health beliefs, attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy for sun protection.

Authors:  K M Jackson; L S Aiken
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Gender differences in young adults' beliefs about sunscreen use.

Authors:  Lorien Abroms; Cynthia M Jorgensen; Brian G Southwell; Alan C Geller; Karen M Emmons
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2003-02

3.  Factors influencing anticipated decisions about sunscreen use.

Authors:  Susan Rasmussen; Rory C O'Connor
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2005-07

4.  Prevalence and correlates of indoor tanning among US adults.

Authors:  Carolyn J Heckman; Elliot J Coups; Sharon L Manne
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Sunburns, sun protection and indoor tanning behaviors, and attitudes regarding sun protection benefits and tan appeal among parents of U.S. adolescents-1998 compared to 2004.

Authors:  Priti Bandi; Vilma E Cokkinides; Martin A Weinstock; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  Pediatr Dermatol       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Availability of tanning beds on US college campuses.

Authors:  Sherry L Pagoto; Stephenie C Lemon; Jessica L Oleski; Jonathan M Scully; Gin-Fei Olendzki; Martinus M Evans; Wenjun Li; L Carter Florence; Brittany Kirkland; Joel J Hillhouse
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 10.282

7.  Psychosocial factors in sunbathing and sunscreen use.

Authors:  B Keesling; H S Friedman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Adolescents' use of indoor tanning: a large-scale evaluation of psychosocial, environmental, and policy-level correlates.

Authors:  Joni A Mayer; Susan I Woodruff; Donald J Slymen; James F Sallis; Jean L Forster; Elizabeth J Clapp; Katherine D Hoerster; Latrice C Pichon; John R Weeks; George E Belch; Martin A Weinstock; Todd Gilmer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  The vitamin D questions: how much do you need and how should you get it?

Authors:  Deon Wolpowitz; Barbara A Gilchrest
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  Interventional three-year longitudinal study of melanocytic naevus development in pre-school children in Dresden, Saxony.

Authors:  Uwe Wollina; Catherine Helm; Annett Bennewitz; Rainer Koch; Kathrin Schaff; Marco Burroni
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.