Literature DB >> 21799338

FDA-sunlamp recommended Maximum Timer Interval And Exposure Schedule: consensus ISO/CIE dose equivalence.

John C Dowdy1, Eugene A Czako, Michael E Stepp, Steven C Schlitt, Gregory R Bender, Lateef U Khan, Kenneth D Shinneman, Manuel G Karos, James G Shepherd, Robert M Sayre.   

Abstract

The authors compared calculations of sunlamp maximum exposure times following current USFDA Guidance Policy on the Maximum Timer Interval and Exposure Schedule, with USFDA/CDRH proposals revising these to equivalent erythemal exposures of ISO/CIE Standard Erythema Dose (SED). In 2003, [USFDA/CDRH proposed replacing their unique CDRH/Lytle] erythema action spectrum with the ISO/CIE erythema action spectrum and revising the sunlamp maximum exposure timer to 600 J m(-2) ISO/CIE effective dose, presented as being biologically equivalent. Preliminary analysis failed to confirm said equivalence, indicating instead ∼38% increased exposure when applying these proposed revisions. To confirm and refine this finding, a collaboration of tanning bed and UV lamp manufacturers compiled 89 UV spectra representing a broad sampling of U.S. indoor tanning equipment. USFDA maximum recommended exposure time (Te) per current sunlamp guidance and CIE erythemal effectiveness per ISO/CIE standard were calculated. The CIE effective dose delivered per Te averaged 456 J(CIE) m(-2) (SD = 0.17) or ∼4.5 SED. The authors found that CDRH's proposed 600 J(CIE) m(-2) recommended maximum sunlamp exposure exceeds current Te erythemal dose by ∼33%. The current USFDA 0.75 MED initial exposure was ∼0.9 SED, consistent with 1.0 SED initial dose in existing international sunlamp standards. As no sunlamps analyzed exceeded 5 SED, a revised maximum exposure of 500 J(CIE) m(-2) (∼80% of CDRH's proposal) should be compatible with existing tanning equipment. A tanning acclimatization schedule is proposed beginning at 1 SED thrice-weekly, increasing uniformly stepwise over 4 wk to a 5 SED maximum exposure in conjunction with a tan maintenance schedule of twice-weekly 5 SED sessions, as biologically equivalent to current USFDA sunlamp policy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21799338     DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3182166490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  4 in total

1.  Adolescents' use of indoor tanning: a large-scale evaluation of psychosocial, environmental, and policy-level correlates.

Authors:  Joni A Mayer; Susan I Woodruff; Donald J Slymen; James F Sallis; Jean L Forster; Elizabeth J Clapp; Katherine D Hoerster; Latrice C Pichon; John R Weeks; George E Belch; Martin A Weinstock; Todd Gilmer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Evidence for a new paradigm for ultraviolet exposure: a universal schedule that is skin phototype independent.

Authors:  Sharon A Miller; Sergio G Coelho; Scott W Miller; Yuji Yamaguchi; Vincent J Hearing; Janusz Z Beer
Journal:  Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.135

3.  Engaging Moms on Teen Indoor Tanning Through Social Media: Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sherry L Pagoto; Katie Baker; Julia Griffith; Jessica L Oleski; Ashley Palumbo; Barbara J Walkosz; Joel Hillhouse; Kimberly L Henry; David B Buller
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-11-29

4.  UVB mutagenesis differs in Nras- and Braf-mutant mouse models of melanoma.

Authors:  Robert L Bowman; Rebecca C Hennessey; Tirzah J Weiss; David A Tallman; Emma R Crawford; Brandon M Murphy; Amy Webb; Souhui Zhang; Krista Md La Perle; Craig J Burd; Ross L Levine; A Hunter Shain; Christin E Burd
Journal:  Life Sci Alliance       Date:  2021-07-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.