BACKGROUND: The prevalence rates of both skin cancers and indoor tanning among the US population are high and have increased substantially in recent years. Low compliance by indoor tanning facilities with safety regulations may place consumers at greater risk of skin and ocular damage. OBJECTIVE: This study quantified the level of compliance by indoor tanning facilities with selected federal and state regulations and recommendations. METHODS: Tanning facilities (N = 54) in San Diego County, California, were visited by a confederate posing as a prospective customer. Compliance with 13 regulations/recommendations were assessed by either direct query or observation of the presence/absence of signs and warning labels. Operators' responses to 5 risk-based questions also were noted. RESULTS: No facility complied with all 13 regulations/recommendations. Compliance with 3 protective eyewear regulations was high (89%-100%). In contrast, compliance with maximum tanning frequency recommendations (approximately 6%) and parental consent regulations (approximately 43%) was disturbingly low. CONCLUSION: The investigators recommend instituting mandatory, comprehensive training for operators, as well as systematic compliance monitoring with enforcement of penalties for noncompliance.
BACKGROUND: The prevalence rates of both skin cancers and indoor tanning among the US population are high and have increased substantially in recent years. Low compliance by indoor tanning facilities with safety regulations may place consumers at greater risk of skin and ocular damage. OBJECTIVE: This study quantified the level of compliance by indoor tanning facilities with selected federal and state regulations and recommendations. METHODS: Tanning facilities (N = 54) in San Diego County, California, were visited by a confederate posing as a prospective customer. Compliance with 13 regulations/recommendations were assessed by either direct query or observation of the presence/absence of signs and warning labels. Operators' responses to 5 risk-based questions also were noted. RESULTS: No facility complied with all 13 regulations/recommendations. Compliance with 3 protective eyewear regulations was high (89%-100%). In contrast, compliance with maximum tanning frequency recommendations (approximately 6%) and parental consent regulations (approximately 43%) was disturbingly low. CONCLUSION: The investigators recommend instituting mandatory, comprehensive training for operators, as well as systematic compliance monitoring with enforcement of penalties for noncompliance.
Authors: Susan I Woodruff; Latrice C Pichon; Katherine D Hoerster; Jean L Forster; Todd Gilmer; Joni A Mayer Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2007-02-05 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Jessica Reimann; Jennifer E McWhirter; Andrew Papadopoulos; Kim Bergeron; Susan Flynn; Loraine Marrett; Thomas Tenkate; Cheryl F Rosen; Cate Dewey Journal: J Community Health Date: 2019-08
Authors: Gery P Guy; Zahava Berkowitz; Sherry Everett Jones; Emily O'Malley Olsen; Justin N Miyamoto; Shannon L Michael; Mona Saraiya Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Mary K Tripp; Meg Watson; Sophie J Balk; Susan M Swetter; Jeffrey E Gershenwald Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Melissa B Gilkey; Darren Mays; Maryam M Asgari; Melanie L Kornides; Annie-Laurie McRee Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2017-05-15 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Joni A Mayer; Susan I Woodruff; Donald J Slymen; James F Sallis; Jean L Forster; Elizabeth J Clapp; Katherine D Hoerster; Latrice C Pichon; John R Weeks; George E Belch; Martin A Weinstock; Todd Gilmer Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-03-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Latrice C Pichon; Joni A Mayer; Katherine D Hoerster; Susan I Woodruff; Donald J Slymen; George E Belch; Elizabeth J Clapp; Ami L Hurd; Jean L Forster; Martin A Weinstock Journal: Arch Dermatol Date: 2009-09
Authors: Sherry Pagoto; Joel Hillhouse; Carolyn J Heckman; Elliot J Coups; Jerod Stapleton; David Buller; Rob Turrisi; June Robinson; Alan C Geller Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Meg Watson; Dawn M Holman; Kathleen A Fox; Gery P Guy; Andrew B Seidenberg; Blake P Sampson; Craig Sinclair; DeAnn Lazovich Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 5.043