Literature DB >> 21421747

Visual search for category sets: tradeoffs between exploration and memory.

Melissa M Kibbe1, Eileen Kowler.   

Abstract

Limitations of working memory force a reliance on motor exploration to retrieve forgotten features of the visual array. A category search task was devised to study tradeoffs between exploration and memory in the face of significant cognitive and motor demands. The task required search through arrays of hidden, multi-featured objects to find three belonging to the same category. Location contents were revealed briefly by either a: (1) mouseclick, or (2) saccadic eye movement with or without delays between saccade offset and object appearance. As the complexity of the category rule increased, search favored exploration, with more visits and revisits needed to find the set. As motor costs increased (mouseclick search or oculomotor search with delays) search favored reliance on memory. Application of the model of J. Epelboim and P. Suppes (2001) to the revisits produced an estimate of immediate memory span (M) of about 4-6 objects. Variation in estimates of M across category rules suggested that search was also driven by strategies of transforming the category rule into concrete perceptual hypotheses. The results show that tradeoffs between memory and exploration in a cognitively demanding task are determined by continual and effective monitoring of perceptual load, cognitive demand, decision strategies and motor effort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21421747      PMCID: PMC3519289          DOI: 10.1167/11.3.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  40 in total

1.  Is visual short-term memory object based? Rejection of the "strong-object" hypothesis.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-10

2.  Comparing eye movements to detected vs. undetected target stimuli in an Identity Search task.

Authors:  Michal Jacob; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Compression in visual working memory: using statistical regularities to form more efficient memory representations.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2009-11

4.  The guidance of eye movements during active visual search.

Authors:  B C Motter; E J Belky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Adjustment of fixation duration in visual search.

Authors:  I T Hooge; C J Erkelens
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

7.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Simple summation rule for optimal fixation selection in visual search.

Authors:  Jiri Najemnik; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  One or two dimensions in spontaneous classification: a simplicity approach.

Authors:  Emmanuel M Pothos; James Close
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-02-20

10.  Microsaccades precisely relocate gaze in a high visual acuity task.

Authors:  Hee-Kyoung Ko; Martina Poletti; Michele Rucci
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Motor control is decision-making.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Timing of saccadic eye movements during visual search for multiple targets.

Authors:  Chia-Chien Wu; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Eye movements while viewing narrated, captioned, and silent videos.

Authors:  Nicholas M Ross; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Benefits and pitfalls of data compression in visual working memory.

Authors:  Laura Lazartigues; Frédéric Lavigne; Carlos Aguilar; Nelson Cowan; Fabien Mathy
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Vibrotactile cuing revisited to reveal a possible challenge to sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Beom-Chan Lee; Timothy A Thrasher; Charles S Layne; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Why are the batteries in the microwave?: Use of semantic information under uncertainty in a search task.

Authors:  Gwendolyn L Rehrig; Michelle Cheng; Brian C McMahan; Rahul Shome
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-04-14

7.  The role of implicit perceptual-motor costs in the integration of information across graph and text.

Authors:  Jason F Rubinstein; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Individual difference in serial dependence results from opposite influences of perceptual choices and motor responses.

Authors:  Huihui Zhang; David Alais
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.