Literature DB >> 21421059

Dynamic assignment of neural resources in auditory comprehension of complex sentences.

Jonas Obleser1, Lars Meyer, Angela D Friederici.   

Abstract

Under real-life adverse listening conditions, the interdependence of the brain's analysis of language structure (syntax) and its analysis of the acoustic signal is unclear. In two fMRI experiments, we first tested the functional neural organization when listening to increasingly complex syntax in fMRI. We then tested parametric combinations of syntactic complexity (argument scrambling in three degrees) with speech signal degradation (noise-band vocoding in three different numbers of bands), to shed light on the mutual dependency of sound and syntax analysis along the neural processing pathways. The left anterior and the posterior superior temporal sulcus (STS) as well as the left inferior frontal cortex (IFG) were linearly more activated as syntactic complexity increased (Experiment 1). In Experiment 2, when syntactic complexity was combined with improving signal quality, this pattern was replicated. However, when syntactic complexity was additive to degrading signal quality, the syntactic complexity effect in the IFG shifted dorsally and medially, and the activation effect in the left posterior STS shifted from posterior toward more middle sections of the sulcus. A distribution analysis of supra- as well as subthreshold data was indicative of this pattern of shifts in the anterior and posterior STS and within the IFG. Results suggest a signal quality gradient within the fronto-temporal language network. More signal-bound processing areas, lower in the processing hierarchy, become relatively more recruited for the analysis of complex language input under more challenging acoustic conditions ("upstream delegation"). This finding provides evidence for dynamic resource assignments along the neural pathways in auditory language comprehension.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21421059     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  23 in total

1.  Phoneme and word recognition in the auditory ventral stream.

Authors:  Iain DeWitt; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Processing noncanonical sentences in broca's region: reflections of movement distance and type.

Authors:  Michiru Makuuchi; Yosef Grodzinsky; Katrin Amunts; Andrea Santi; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  How the development of handedness could contribute to the development of language.

Authors:  George F Michel; Iryna Babik; Eliza L Nelson; Julie M Campbell; Emily C Marcinowski
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.038

4.  Hearing loss in older adults affects neural systems supporting speech comprehension.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle; Vanessa Troiani; Murray Grossman; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Deaf children with cochlear implants do not appear to use sentence context to help recognize spoken words.

Authors:  Christopher M Conway; Joanne A Deocampo; Anne M Walk; Esperanza M Anaya; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Listening under difficult conditions: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claude Alain; Yi Du; Lori J Bernstein; Thijs Barten; Karen Banai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Suppressed alpha oscillations predict intelligibility of speech and its acoustic details.

Authors:  Jonas Obleser; Nathan Weisz
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Acoustic richness modulates the neural networks supporting intelligible speech processing.

Authors:  Yune-Sang Lee; Nam Eun Min; Arthur Wingfield; Murray Grossman; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Temporal cortex reflects effects of sentence context on phonetic processing.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Caden Salvata; Sheila E Blumstein
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Syntax-Sensitive Regions of the Posterior Inferior Frontal Gyrus and the Posterior Temporal Lobe Are Differentially Recruited by Production and Perception.

Authors:  William Matchin; Emily Wood
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.