Literature DB >> 21419438

The relationship between prostate specific antigen change and biopsy progression in patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Jared M Whitson1, Sima P Porten, Joan F Hilton, Janet E Cowan, Nannette Perez, Matthew R Cooperberg, Kirsten L Greene, Maxwell V Meng, Jeff P Simko, Katsuto Shinohara, Peter R Carroll.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed whether an association exists between a change in prostate specific antigen and biopsy progression in men on active surveillance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of patients undergoing active surveillance for prostate cancer was identified from the urological oncology database at our institution. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine whether prostate specific antigen velocity, defined as the change in ln(prostate specific antigen) per year, is associated with biopsy progression, defined as a Gleason upgrade or volume progression on repeat biopsy within 24 months of diagnosis.
RESULTS: A total of 241 men with a mean ± SD age of 61 ± 7 years and mean prostate specific antigen 4.9 ± 2.2 ng/ml met study inclusion criteria. Median time to repeat biopsy was 10 months (IQR 6-13). Biopsy progression developed in 55 men (23%), including a Gleason score upgrade in 46 (19%), greater than 33% positive cores in 11 (5%) and greater than 50% maximum single core positive in 12 (5%). The median prostate specific antigen ratio per year was 1.0 (IQR 0.95-1.03), although 1 man had a ratio of greater than 1.26 (doubled over 3 years) and 7 had a ratio of less than 1/1.26 (halved over 3 years). On multivariate analysis prostate specific antigen doubling within 3 years was associated with a 1.4-fold increase in the odds of biopsy progression (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.6-3.4, p = 0.46).
CONCLUSIONS: There is little change in prostate specific antigen during the first 24 months of surveillance in men with well staged, low risk prostate cancer. We believe that these findings highlight the importance of repeat biopsy during surveillance.
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21419438     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  41 in total

1.  [Patterns of care of patients with localized prostate cancer in Germany: a health care study with focus on active surveillance].

Authors:  F K H Chun; A Becker; L A Kluth; D Seiler; D Schnell; M Fisch; M Graefen; L Weissbach
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Surveillance biopsy and active treatment during active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Katsuyoshi Hashine; Hiroyuki Iio; Yoshiteru Ueno; Shohei Tsukimori; Iku Ninomiya
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  A biopsy-integrated algorithm for determining Gleason 6 upgrading risk stratifies risk of active surveillance failure in prostate cancer.

Authors:  M L Blute; J M Shiau; M Truong; Fangfang Shi; E J Abel; T M Downs; D F Jarrard
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  [Active surveillance of low risk prostate cancer].

Authors:  K Lellig; B Beyer; M Graefen; D Zaak; C Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Parameters of prostate cancer at contrast-enhanced ultrasound: correlation with prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Guang Xu; Jian Wu; Ming-Hua Yao; Xu-Dong Yao; Bo Peng; Qing Wei; Hui-Xiong Xu; Rong Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

Review 6.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of clinicopathologic variables and biomarkers for risk stratification.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Sophie M Bruinsma; Joseph Nicholson; Alberto Briganti; Tom Pickles; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  A comparative assessment of active surveillance for localized prostate cancer in the community versus tertiary care referral center.

Authors:  Andreas Becker; Daniel Seiler; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Luis Alex Kluth; Dietrich Schnell; Markus Graefen; Thorsten Schlomm; Margit Fisch; Franz Recker; Lothar Weissbach; Felix K H Chun
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; H Ballentine Carter; Abbey Lepor; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  Biomarkers in prostate cancer surveillance and screening: past, present, and future.

Authors:  K Clint Cary; Mathew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2013-12

10.  Our results of active surveillance for localized prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Hasan Soydan; Furkan Dursun; Ömer Yılmaz; Sezgin Okçelik; Ferhat Ateş; Kenan Karademir
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.