Literature DB >> 24957523

[Active surveillance of low risk prostate cancer].

K Lellig1, B Beyer, M Graefen, D Zaak, C Stief.   

Abstract

In Europe prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers among men. The diagnostics always include a control of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and examination of a representative tissue sample from the prostate. With these findings it is possible to evaluate the degree of progression of the cancer and its prognosis. Several treatment options for localized prostate cancer are given by national and international guidelines including radical prostatectomy, percutaneous radiation therapy, or brachytherapy and surveillance of the cancer with optional treatment at a later stage. For the latter treatment option, known as active surveillance, strict criteria have to be met. The advantage of active surveillance is that only patients with progressive cancer are subjected to radical therapy. Patients with very slow or non-progressing cancer do not have to undergo therapy and thus do not have to suffer from the side effects. The basic idea behind active surveillance is that some cancers will not progress to a stage that requires treatment within the lifetime of the patient and therefore do not require treatment at all. Unfortunately the criteria for active surveillance are not definitive enough at the current time leading only to a delay in effective treatment for many patients. The surveillance strategy has without doubt a high significance among the treatment options for prostate cancer; however, at the current time it lacks reliable indicators for a certain prognosis. Therefore, patients must be informed in detail about the advantages and disadvantages of active surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24957523     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-014-3535-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  56 in total

1.  Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update.

Authors:  Ian Thompson; James Brantley Thrasher; Gunnar Aus; Arthur L Burnett; Edith D Canby-Hagino; Michael S Cookson; Anthony V D'Amico; Roger R Dmochowski; David T Eton; Jeffrey D Forman; S Larry Goldenberg; Javier Hernandez; Celestia S Higano; Stephen R Kraus; Judd W Moul; Catherine M Tangen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Active surveillance: patient selection.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging for predicting prostate biopsy findings in patients considered for active surveillance of clinically low risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hebert Alberto Vargas; Oguz Akin; Asim Afaq; Debra Goldman; Junting Zheng; Chaya S Moskowitz; Amita Shukla-Dave; James Eastham; Peter Scardino; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Factors that influence patient enrollment in active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Gorin; Cynthia T Soloway; Ahmed Eldefrawy; Mark S Soloway
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Bruce J Trock; Patricia Landis; Zhaoyong Feng; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Careful selection and close monitoring of low-risk prostate cancer patients on active surveillance minimizes the need for treatment.

Authors:  Mark S Soloway; Cynthia T Soloway; Ahmed Eldefrawy; Kristell Acosta; Bruce Kava; Murugesan Manoharan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Outcomes following active surveillance of men with localized prostate cancer diagnosed in the prostate specific antigen era.

Authors:  Barbara Ercole; Sarah R Marietti; Judith Fine; Peter C Albertsen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Characteristics of insignificant clinical T1c prostate tumors. A contemporary analysis.

Authors:  Patrick J Bastian; Leslie A Mangold; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  MRI-ultrasound fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Leonard Marks; Shelena Young; Shyam Natarajan
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.309

10.  A model of the natural history of screen-detected prostate cancer, and the effect of radical treatment on overall survival.

Authors:  C Parker; D Muston; J Melia; S Moss; D Dearnaley
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  Final pathohistology after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance (AS).

Authors:  Ekaterina Lellig; Christian Gratzke; Alexander Kretschmer; Christian Stief
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  [Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer].

Authors:  Annika Herlemann; Christian G Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.