Literature DB >> 25391440

[Patterns of care of patients with localized prostate cancer in Germany: a health care study with focus on active surveillance].

F K H Chun1, A Becker, L A Kluth, D Seiler, D Schnell, M Fisch, M Graefen, L Weissbach.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To date, evidence on active surveillance (AS) is restricted to protocol-based studies and the current practice pattern outside medical centers is unknown.
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this work was to capture the current treatment pattern of AS for localized prostate cancer (PCa) in patients managed by office-based urologists in Germany.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our cohort consisted of 361 patients included in the AS arm of the HAROW (Hormonal Treatment, Active Surveillance, Radiation Therapy, OP, Watchful Waiting) study, an observational health service study in Germany. Descriptive characteristics and active-treatment-free survival (ATFS), surgical outcomes, and triggers for active treatment were assessed.
RESULTS: Currently, only 15% of all patients with localized PCa were treated with AS. At baseline, 83% and 58% of all AS patients met the Chism and PRIAS low-risk criteria, respectively. After a median follow-up of 24 months, no systemic progression was observed, 5 patients died of non-disease-specific causes and active treatment was delivered in 20.5% of all patients. Triggers for active therapy were progression at biopsy (42%), rise in prostate-specific antigen level (27%), medical advice (16%) and patient's preference (10%), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Our short-term results indicate that - in the hands of office-based urologists - active surveillance might represent a feasible treatment option for patients with localized PCa. The majority of patients were free of active treatment 2 years after AS initiation. Generally accepted inclusion and progression criteria are lacking and should be developed in order to facilitate and standardize AS in patients with low-risk PCa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25391440     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-014-3647-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  24 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Impact of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality from radical cystectomy: data from the health care utilization project.

Authors:  Badrinath R Konety; Vibhu Dhawan; Veerasathpurush Allareddy; Sue A Joslyn
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Prospective validation of active surveillance in prostate cancer: the PRIAS study.

Authors:  Roderick C N van den Bergh; Stijn Roemeling; Monique J Roobol; Wouter Roobol; Fritz H Schröder; Chris H Bangma
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Outcomes of men with screen-detected prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance who were managed expectantly.

Authors:  Roderick C N van den Bergh; Stijn Roemeling; Monique J Roobol; Gunnar Aus; Jonas Hugosson; Antti S Rannikko; Teuvo L Tammela; Chris H Bangma; Fritz H Schröder
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Bruce J Trock; Patricia Landis; Zhaoyong Feng; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Preoperative risk stratification predicts likelihood of concurrent PSA-free survival, continence, and potency (the trifecta analysis) after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Benjamin A Spencer; Tara R McCann; James M McKiernan; Mitchell C Benson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  [Therapy choices of German urologists and radio-oncologists if personally diagnosed with localized prostate cancer].

Authors:  R Gillitzer; C Hampel; C Thomas; F Schmidt; S W Melchior; S Pahernik; H Schmidberger; J W Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  A comparison of the single and double factor high-risk models for risk assignment of prostate cancer treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  Derek B Chism; Alexandra L Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Steven J Feigenberg; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz; Liying Zhang; Adam Lam; Robert Nam; Alexandre Mamedov; Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  T A Stamey; F S Freiha; J E McNeal; E A Redwine; A S Whittemore; H P Schmid
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Treatment mapping of prostate cancer in DVPZ prostate centers in Germany].

Authors:  R Berges; T Ebert; W Schafhauser; W Schultze-Seemann; M Braun; J Herden; P Weib; M Garcia Schürmann; M Reimann; C Bornhof; F Oberpenning; P Baur; J Zumbé; E Gronau; W Diederichs; O A Brinkman; M Goepel; A Göll; K Hoefner; M Kriegmair; S Laabs; B Planz; G Platz; A Heidenreich
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.