Literature DB >> 9599990

The perception of surface curvature from optical motion.

V J Perotti1, J T Todd, J S Lappin, F Phillips.   

Abstract

Observers viewed the optical flow field of a rotating quadric surface patch and were required to match its perceived structure by adjusting the shape of a stereoscopically presented surface. In Experiment 1, the flow fields included rigid object rotations and constant flow fields with patterns of image acceleration that had no possible rigid interpretation. In performing their matches, observers had independent control of two parameters that determined the surface shape. One of these, called the shape characteristic, is defined as the ratio of the two principle curvatures and is independent of object size. The other, called curvedness, is defined as the sum of the squared principle curvatures and depends on the size of the object. Adjustments of shape characteristic were almost perfectly accurate for both motion conditions. Adjustments of curvedness, on the other hand, were systematically over-estimated and were not highly correlated with the simulated curvedness of the depicted surface patch. In Experiment 2, the same flow fields were masked with a global pattern of curl, divergence, or shear, which disrupted the first-order spatial derivatives of the image velocity field, while leaving the second-order spatial derivatives invariant. The addition of these masks had only negligible effects on observers' performance. These findings suggest that observers' judgments of three-dimensional surface shape from motion are primarily determined by the second-order spatial derivatives of the instantaneous field of image displacements.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9599990     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  11 in total

1.  Large perspective changes yield perception of metric shape that allows accurate feedforward reaches-to-grasp and it persists after the optic flow has stopped!

Authors:  Young-Lim Lee; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The selectivity of neurons in the macaque fundus of the superior temporal area for three-dimensional structure from motion.

Authors:  Santosh G Mysore; Rufin Vogels; Steven E Raiguel; James T Todd; Guy A Orban
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Voluntary attention modulates motion-induced mislocalization.

Authors:  Peter U Tse; David Whitney; Stuart Anstis; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  How do animals get about by vision? Visually controlled locomotion and orientation after 50 years.

Authors:  William H Warren
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2009-04

5.  Does this computational theory solve the right problem? Marr, Gibson, and the goal of vision.

Authors:  William H Warren
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Local Solid Shape.

Authors:  Jan Koenderink; Andrea van Doorn; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2015-10-30

7.  Form and Function in Information for Visual Perception.

Authors:  Joseph S Lappin; Herbert H Bell
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2021-12-23

8.  The influence of intersensory discrepancy on visuo-haptic integration is similar in 6-year-old children and adults.

Authors:  Bianca Jovanovic; Knut Drewing
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-30

9.  Visual and haptic integration in the estimation of softness of deformable objects.

Authors:  Cristiano Cellini; Lukas Kaim; Knut Drewing
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-11-29

Review 10.  What is binocular disparity?

Authors:  Joseph S Lappin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.