Literature DB >> 21409606

Minimally invasive esophagectomy: the evolution and technique of minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer.

Toshitaka Hoppo1, Blair A Jobe, John G Hunter.   

Abstract

Beginning with the widespread introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in late 1989, minimally invasive surgical technique has been refined in conjunction with the development of advanced instrumentation and have subsequently been applied to increasingly complicated disease processes. Esophageal surgeons have increasingly incorporated minimally invasive surgery into their practice since the first laparoscopic fundoplication was described by Dallemagne et al. in 1991. Esophagectomy is associated with significant morbidity and mortality even in highly experienced centers. Many esophageal surgeons have had a great deal of interest in minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), which has the potential advantages of being a less traumatic procedure with a resultant improvement in postoperative convalescence and fewer wound and cardiopulmonary complications compared to the open approaches. Throughout the 1990s, as confidence with laparoscopic surgery of the esophagogastric junction grew, MIE was initially attempted with hybrid operations combining traditional open surgery with minimally invasive approaches. Subsequently, a totally laparoscopic transhiatal approach was described; however, this approach was perceived to be very challenging and has not gained widespread acceptance. Approaches used at present depend on cancer stage, cancer location, body habitus, and pulmonary function. For localized cancer (T1N0) or HGD, we prefer laparoscopic inversion esophagectomy (retrograde or antigrade). This approach may also be used for patients at high risk for thoracotomy. For locally advanced cancer in the middle third of the esophagus or for proximal third esophageal cancer, we prefer 3-field MIE (abdomen, and chest with neck anastomosis). For locally advanced cancer in the distal esophagus, especially in patients with a short thick neck, we prefer thoracoscopic-laparoscopic (2-field) esophagectomy (TLE).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21409606     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-011-1049-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  34 in total

1.  Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort.

Authors:  Stephen H Bailey; David A Bull; David H Harpole; Jeffrey J Rentz; Leigh A Neumayer; Theodore N Pappas; Jennifer Daley; William G Henderson; Barbara Krasnicka; Shukri F Khuri
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  M Vierra
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 13.739

3.  Esophagectomy without thoracotomy with vagal preservation.

Authors:  H Akiyama; M Tsurumaru; Y Ono; H Udagawa; Y Kajiyama
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  A physiologic approach to laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  J G Hunter; T L Trus; G D Branum; J P Waring; W C Wood
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Comparison of laparoscopic inversion esophagectomy and open transhiatal esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and stage I esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kyle A Perry; C Kristian Enestvedt; Thai Pham; Melissa Welker; Blair A Jobe; John G Hunter; Brett C Sheppard
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-07

Review 6.  Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy.

Authors:  B Zane Atkins; Ashish S Shah; Kelley A Hutcheson; Jennifer H Mangum; Theodore N Pappas; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  A 15-year review of esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and cardia.

Authors:  K W Millikan; J Silverstein; V Hart; K Blair; S Bines; J Roberts; A Doolas
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1995-06

8.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Evaluation of primary repair in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  T R DeMeester; L Bonavina; M Albertucci
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kamal Nagpal; Kamran Ahmed; Amit Vats; Danny Yakoub; David James; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Krishna Moorthy; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  12 in total

1.  Increased resection rates and survival among patients aged 75 years and older with esophageal cancer: a Dutch nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Zohra Faiz; Valery E P P Lemmens; Peter D Siersema; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Michel W J M Wouters; Tom Rozema; Jan Willem W Coebergh; Bas P L Wijnhoven
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Evolution in the Treatment of Esophageal Disease at a Single Academic Institution: 2004-2013.

Authors:  James P Dolan; Patrick J McLaren; Brian S Diggs; Paul H Schipper; Brandon H Tieu; Brett C Sheppard; Erin W Gilbert; Molly A Conroy; John G Hunter
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 1.878

3.  Lymph Node Harvest During Esophagectomy Is Not Influenced by Use of Neoadjuvant Therapy or Clinical Disease Stage.

Authors:  Renato A Luna; James P Dolan; Brian S Diggs; Nathan W Bronson; Brett C Sheppard; Paul H Schipper; Brandon H Tieu; Benjamin T Feeney; Ken M Gatter; Gina M Vaccaro; Charles R Thomas; John G Hunter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Comparison of the perioperative outcome of esophagectomy by thoracoscopy in the prone position with that of thoracotomy in the lateral decubitus position.

Authors:  Tomoaki Yatabe; Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Koichi Yamashita; Kazuhiro Hanazaki; Masataka Yokoyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Effects of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and Open Esophagectomy on Circulating Tumor Cell Level in Elderly Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Hai-Bo Wang; Qiang Guo; Yong-Hui Li; Zhen-Qing Sun; Ting-Ting Li; Wen-Xue Zhang; Sha-Sha Xiang; He-Fei Li
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Contribution of robotics to minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Ismael Diez Del Val; Carlos Loureiro Gonzalez; Santiago Larburu Etxaniz; Julen Barrenetxea Asua; Saioa Leturio Fernandez; Sandra Ruiz Carballo; Eider Etxebarria Beitia; Patricia Perez de Villarreal; Lorena Hierro-Olabarria; Jose Esteban Bilbao Axpe; Jaime Jesus Mendez Martin
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-01-24

7.  Transhiatal Esophagectomy without Mediastinal Manipulation for Lower Third Esophageal and Cardial Cancers: The First Experience of a New Technique.

Authors:  Seyed Abbas Tabatabaei; Seyed Mozafar Hashemi; Behrooz Kelidari
Journal:  Iran J Cancer Prev       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

8.  Robotic transthoracic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Shailesh Puntambekar; Rahul Kenawadekar; Sanjay Kumar; Saurabh Joshi; Geetanjali Agarwal; Sunil Reddy; Jainul Mallik
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 9.  Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Waresijiang Yibulayin; Sikandaer Abulizi; Hongbo Lv; Wei Sun
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer - benefits and controversies.

Authors:  Grzegorz Wallner; Witold Zgodziński; Wioletta Masiak-Segit; Tomasz Skoczylas; Andrzej Dąbrowski
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2014-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.