| Literature DB >> 27001870 |
Ismael Diez Del Val1, Carlos Loureiro Gonzalez2, Santiago Larburu Etxaniz3, Julen Barrenetxea Asua2, Saioa Leturio Fernandez4, Sandra Ruiz Carballo4, Eider Etxebarria Beitia4, Patricia Perez de Villarreal4, Lorena Hierro-Olabarria4, Jose Esteban Bilbao Axpe2, Jaime Jesus Mendez Martin4.
Abstract
Robot-assisted surgery has the advantages of a three-dimensional view, versatility of instruments and better ergonomics. It allows fine dissection and difficult anastomoses in deep fields. Based on our experience, we try to define what are the main contributions of robotics to minimally invasive esophagectomy. From December 2009 to July 2012, we performed 24 minimally invasive esophagectomies (9 transhiatal, 5 Ivor-Lewis and 10 three-field), 16 of them robotically (8, 5 and 3, respectively). Eighteen patients (18/24 = 75 %) received neoadjuvant therapy. Nine patients (9/24 = 37.5 %) had symptomatic complications: 4 anastomotic leaks treated conservatively, one staple failure of the gastric plasty needing reoperation, one biliary peritonitis secondary to a gangrenous cholecystitis, one intrathoracic gastric migration after the only nonresectable case, one chylothorax and one patient with major cardiopulmonary complications. The median number of lymph nodes harvested was 12 ± 7. Median length of stay was 14 ± 13.5 days. Thirty-day mortality was nil. Complications were not related to the robot itself but to the complexity of both the technique and the patient. Although we found no advantages for the use of robotics during threefield minimally invasive esophagectomy, robotic mediastinal dissection during transhiatal esophagectomy can be performed safely under direct vision. Moreover, hand-sewn robotic-assisted technique in the prone position is promising and maybe the simplest way to carry out thoracic anastomosis during Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.Entities:
Keywords: Esophagectomy; Esophagus; Ivor-Lewis; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; Robotic surgery; Transhiatal esophagectomy
Year: 2013 PMID: 27001870 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-012-0391-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Robot Surg ISSN: 1863-2483