Literature DB >> 21404035

Posterior spinal instrumentation: biomechanical study on the role of rods on hardware response to axial load.

Giuseppe Gioia1, Celeste Scotti, Davide Mandelli, Giuseppe Sala.   

Abstract

Posterior spinal instrumentation is frequently used for the treatment of spine disorders. Importantly, different requirements have to be considered for the optimal use of these systems in various clinical scenarios. In this work, we focused on the role of rods diameter on hardware's stiffness. For this purpose, we established an in vitro model and compared the response to axial load of a posterior stabilization system, characterized by rods of different diameter (4, 5, 6 mm), with that of Dynesys®. Intuitively, the higher the stiffness of the hardware, the lower the load is transferred to the disc. However, the 4 hardware tested showed a different trend in the response to the load regimens: when increasing the load, more flexible systems display a progressive reduction in the percentage of load which is transferred to the disc while more rigid system display the opposite trend. Considering that the load which is transferred, and not by-passed by the hardware, influences the healing of a fracture; the integration of a bone graft or a cage; the fusion process, these data have a relevant impact on clinical practice and highlight features that have to be considered in the choice for the optimal posterior spinal instrumentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21404035      PMCID: PMC3087045          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1746-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  13 in total

1.  Load-sharing characteristics of stabilized lumbar spine segments.

Authors:  P A Cripton; G M Jain; R H Wittenberg; L P Nolte
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life.

Authors:  H J Wilke; P Neef; M Caimi; T Hoogland; L E Claes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Some mechanical tests on the lumbosacral spine with particular reference to the intervertebral discs; a preliminary report.

Authors:  T BROWN; R J HANSEN; A J YORRA
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1957-10       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  The indications and principles of correction of post-traumatic deformities.

Authors:  J Harms; D Stoltze
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group.

Authors:  P Fritzell; O Hägg; P Wessberg; A Nordwall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Is fusion indicated for lumbar spinal disorders?

Authors:  V K Sonntag; F F Marciano
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system.

Authors:  Thomas M Stoll; Gilles Dubois; Othmar Schwarzenbach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-09-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Successful short-segment instrumentation and fusion for thoracolumbar spine fractures: a consecutive 41/2-year series.

Authors:  J W Parker; J R Lane; E E Karaikovic; R W Gaines
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Internal fixation in the osteoporotic spine.

Authors:  S S Hu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Morphometric study of the human lumbar spine for operation-workspace specifications.

Authors:  A Wolf; M Shoham; S Michael; R Moshe
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical and radiological comparison of posterolateral fusion and posterior interbody fusion techniques for multilevel lumbar spinal stabilization in manual workers.

Authors:  Hayati Aygün; Albert Cakar; Nergiz Hüseyinoğlu; Urfettin Hüseyinoğlu; Recep Celik
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-10-18

2.  The influence of L4-S1 Dynesys® dynamic stabilization versus fusion on lumbar motion and its relationship with lumbar degeneration: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Chengmin Zhang; Liyuan Wang; Tianyong Hou; Lei Luo; Chen Zhao; Yibo Gan; Qiang Zhou; Pei Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 2.359

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.