Literature DB >> 10685480

Load-sharing characteristics of stabilized lumbar spine segments.

P A Cripton1, G M Jain, R H Wittenberg, L P Nolte.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Load sharing in stabilized spinal segments was evaluated using sequential injury and stabilization with a posterior instrumentation system under an in vitro flexibility protocol.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the partitioning of applied loads between anatomic and implanted structures of lumbar functional spinal units stabilized with a posterior instrumentation system. To identify surgical indications for which the risk of fixator breakage in vivo is high. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Relatively few groups have experimentally measured the in vitro and in vivo forces and/or moments supported by posterior instrumentation systems, and no analysis, of the load sharing in these systems has been performed. This information will provide novel insight into implant fatigue life, and the degree to which the spinal anatomy is shielded from the applied load and will allow the verification of mathematical models for new injury scenarios.
METHODS: Specimen kinematics were determined using an optoelectronic tracking system. Intradiscal pressure and the forces and moments supported by the implants were measured using, respectively, a needle-mounted pressure sensor and strain gauges mounted on the spinal implants.
RESULTS: A large majority of the applied moments were supported by an equal and opposite force pair between the intervertebral disc and fixator rods in flexion and extension and an equal and opposite force pair between the left and right fixator rods in lateral bending. Torsional moments were shared approximately equally between the posterior elements, intervertebral disc, an equal and opposite shear force pair in the transverse plane between the right and left fixators and internal fixator moments.
CONCLUSIONS: When posterior instrumentation devices are used to stabilize severe anterior column injuries, they are at risk of fracture secondary to reversed bending moments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10685480     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200001150-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  18 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System® (TFAS®): loading as compared to a rigid posterior instrumentation system.

Authors:  Simon G Sjovold; Qingan Zhu; Anton Bowden; Chad R Larson; Peter M de Bakker; Marta L Villarraga; Jorge A Ochoa; David M Rosler; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparative biomechanical investigation of a modular dynamic lumbar stabilization system and the Dynesys system.

Authors:  Philippe Gédet; Daniel Haschtmann; Paul A Thistlethwaite; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biomechanical comparison of two different concepts for stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Philipp Schleicher; R Gerlach; B Schär; C M J Cain; W Achatz; R Pflugmacher; N P Haas; F Kandziora
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Posterior spinal instrumentation: biomechanical study on the role of rods on hardware response to axial load.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gioia; Celeste Scotti; Davide Mandelli; Giuseppe Sala
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Characterization of the behavior of a novel low-stiffness posterior spinal implant under anterior shear loading on a degenerative spinal model.

Authors:  Angela D Melnyk; Jason D Chak; Vaneet Singh; Adrienne Kelly; Peter A Cripton; Charles G Fisher; Marcel F Dvorak; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Current Concepts of Contemporary Expandable Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Designs, Part 1: An Editorial on Their Biomechanical Characteristics.

Authors:  Boyle C Cheng; Isaac Swink; Rachelle Yusufbekov; Michele Birgelen; Lisa Ferrara; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Domagoj Coric
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-29

7.  Stress analysis of the implants in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under static and vibration loadings: a comparison between pedicle screw fixation system with rigid and flexible rods.

Authors:  Wei Fan; Li-Xin Guo; Dan Zhao
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Current Concepts of Contemporary Expandable Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Designs, Part 2: Feasibility Assessment of an Endplate Conforming Bidirectional Expandable Interbody Cage.

Authors:  Boyle C Cheng; Isaac Swink; Rachelle Yusufbekov; Michele Birgelen; Lisa Ferrara; Domagoj Coric
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-29

9.  Non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine with a hinged pedicle screw rod system: an in vitro experiment.

Authors:  Werner Schmoelz; U Onder; A Martin; A von Strempel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Stability and Load Sharing Characteristics of a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Device.

Authors:  Daniel J Cook; Matthew S Yeager; Shankar S Thampi; Donald M Whiting; Boyle C Cheng
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.