Literature DB >> 10788862

Successful short-segment instrumentation and fusion for thoracolumbar spine fractures: a consecutive 41/2-year series.

J W Parker1, J R Lane, E E Karaikovic, R W Gaines.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective review of all the surgically managed spinal fractures at the University of Missouri Medical Center during the 41/2-year period from January 1989 to July 1993 was performed. Of the 51 surgically managed patients, 46 were instrumented by short-segment technique (attachment of one level above the fracture to one level below the fracture). The other 5 patients in this consecutive series had multiple trauma. These patients were included in the review because this was a consecutive series. However, they were grouped separately because they were instrumented by long-segment technique because of their multiple organ system injuries.
OBJECTIVES: The choice of the anterior or posterior approach for short-segment instrumentation was based on the Load-Sharing Classification published in a 1994 issue of Spine. The purpose of this review was to demonstrate that grading comminution by use of the Load-Sharing Classification for approach selection and the choice of patients with isolated fractures who are cooperative with spinal bracing for 4 months provide the keys to successful short-segment treatment of isolated spinal fractures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The current literature implies that the use of pedicle screws for short-segment instrumentation of spinal fracture is dangerous and inappropriate because of the high screw fracture rate.
METHODS: Charts, operative notes, preoperative and postoperative radiographs, computed tomography scans, and follow-up records of all patients were reviewed carefully from the time of surgery until final follow-up assessment. The Load-Sharing Classification had been used prospectively for all patients before their surgery to determine the approach for short-segment instrumentation. Denis' Pain Scale and Work Scales were obtained during follow-up evaluation for all patients.
RESULTS: All patients were observed over 40 months except for 1 patient who died of unrelated causes after 35 months. The mean follow-up period was 66 months (51/2 years). No patient was lost to follow-up evaluation. Prospective application of the Load-Sharing Classification to the patients' injury and restriction of the short-segment approach to cooperative patients with isolated spinal fractures (excluding multisystem trauma patients) allowed 45 of 46 patients instrumented by the short-segment technique to proceed to successful healing in virtual anatomic alignment.
CONCLUSIONS: The Load-Sharing Classification is a straightforward way to describe the amount of bony comminution in a spinal fracture. When applied to patients with isolated spine fractures who are cooperative with 3 to 4 months of spinal bracing, it can help the surgeon select short-segment pedicle-screw-based fixation using the posterior approach for less comminuted injuries and the anterior approach for those more comminuted. The choice of which fracture-dislocations should be strut grafted anteriorly and which need only posterior short-segment pedicle-screw-based instrumentation also can be made using the Load-Sharing Classification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10788862     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200005010-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  83 in total

1.  Percutaneous augmented instrumentation of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Authors:  Nimrod Rahamimov; Hani Mulla; Adi Shani; Shay Freiman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Thoracic pedicle screw insertion in Asian cadaveric specimen: does radiological pedicle profile affect outcome?

Authors:  Chris Yin Wei Chan; Mun Keong Kwan; Lim Beng Saw
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Mid-term results of PLIF/TLIF in trauma.

Authors:  Rene Schmid; Dietmar Krappinger; Michael Blauth; Anton Kathrein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Treatment options for thoracolumbar spine fractures.

Authors:  Eldin E Karaiković; Hector O Pacheco
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.363

5.  Treatment of unstable thoracolumbar junction burst fractures with short- or long-segment posterior fixation in magerl type a fractures.

Authors:  Murat Altay; Bülent Ozkurt; Cem Nuri Aktekin; Akif Muhtar Ozturk; Ozgür Dogan; A Yalçin Tabak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Minimally invasive spine stabilisation with long implants.

Authors:  Carlo Ambrogio Logroscino; Luca Proietti; Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Principles of management of thoracolumbar fractures.

Authors:  Li-yang Dai
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.071

8.  Safety of thoracic pedicle screw application using the funnel technique in Asians: a cadaveric evaluation.

Authors:  Chris Yin Wei Chan; Mun Keong Kwan; Lim Beng Saw
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Automated Detection, Localization, and Classification of Traumatic Vertebral Body Fractures in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine at CT.

Authors:  Joseph E Burns; Jianhua Yao; Hector Muñoz; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Posterior spinal instrumentation: biomechanical study on the role of rods on hardware response to axial load.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gioia; Celeste Scotti; Davide Mandelli; Giuseppe Sala
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.