Literature DB >> 21403989

Do less medialized reverse shoulder prostheses increase motion and reduce notching?

Philippe Valenti1, Philippe Sauzières, Denis Katz, Ibrahim Kalouche, Alexandre Sahin Kilinc.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cuff tear arthropathy is the primary indication for total reverse shoulder arthroplasty. In patients with pseudoparalytic shoulders secondary to irreparable rotator cuff tear, reverse shoulder arthroplasty allows restoration of active anterior elevation and painless shoulder. High rates of glenoid notching have also been reported. We designed a new reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a center of rotation more lateral than the Delta prosthesis to address this problem. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Does reduced medialization of reverse shoulder arthroplasty improve shoulder motion, decrease glenoid notching, or increase the risk of glenoid loosening? PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 76 patients with 76 less medialized reverse shoulder prostheses implanted for pseudoparalytic shoulder with rotator cuff deficiency between October 2003 and May 2006. Shoulder motion, Constant-Murley score, and plain radiographs were analyzed. Minimum followup was 24 months (mean, 44 months; range, 24-60 months).
RESULTS: The absolute Constant-Murley score increased from 24 to 59, representing an increase of 35 points. The range of active anterior elevation increased by 61°, and the improvement in pain was 10 points. The gain in external rotation with elbow at the side was 15°, while external rotation with 90° abduction increased by 30°. Followup showed no glenoid notching and no glenoid loosening with these less medialized reverse prostheses.
CONCLUSIONS: Less medialization of reverse shoulder arthroplasty improves external and medial rotation, thus facilitating the activities of daily living of older patients. The absence of glenoid notching and glenoid loosening hopefully reflects longer prosthesis survival, but longer followup is necessary to confirm these preliminary observations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21403989      PMCID: PMC3148376          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1844-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  28 in total

1.  [Mechanical complications of total shoulder inverted prosthesis].

Authors:  C Delloye; D Joris; A Colette; A Eudier; J E Dubuc
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2002-06

2.  Grammont's reverse shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff arthropathy. A retrospective study of 32 cases.

Authors:  Benoit Vanhove; Alain Beugnies
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.500

3.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.

Authors:  C R Constant; A H Murley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Recent experience in total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  C S Neer; K C Watson; F J Stanton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Grammont reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and nonreconstructible rotator cuff lesions.

Authors:  M Rittmeister; F Kerschbaumer
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Shoulder prostheses treating cuff tear arthropathy: a comparative biomechanical study.

Authors:  L F De Wilde; E A Audenaert; B M Berghs
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Cuff-tear arthropathy.

Authors:  C S Neer; E V Craig; H Fukuda
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders.

Authors:  F Sirveaux; L Favard; D Oudet; D Huquet; G Walch; D Molé
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

9.  Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christophe Lévigne; Pascal Boileau; Luc Favard; Pascal Garaud; Daniel Molé; François Sirveaux; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Early results of a reverse design prosthesis in the treatment of arthritis of the shoulder in elderly patients with a large rotator cuff tear.

Authors:  Aziz Boulahia; T Bradley Edwards; Gilles Walch; Richard V Baratta
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  42 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Does Humeral Component Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Affect Rotator Cuff Torque? Evaluation in a Cadaver Model.

Authors:  Konrad I Gruson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Petrillo; U G Longo; R Papalia; V Denaro
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-04-25

3.  Lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty maintains rotational function of the remaining rotator cuff.

Authors:  Stefan Greiner; Christan Schmidt; Christian König; Carsten Perka; Sebastian Herrmann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A kinematic and electromyographic comparison of a Grammont-style reverse arthroplasty combined with a l'Episcopo transfer compared to a lateralized humeral component reverse for restoration of active external rotation.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Francesco Cuoghi; George S Athwal; Ilaria Parel; Maria V Filippi; Andrea G Cutti; Elisabetta Fabbri; Antonio Padolino; Paolo Paladini; Fabio Catani; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Management of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes, reoperation rates, and treatment response.

Authors:  David Kovacevic; Robert J Suriani; Brian M Grawe; Edward H Yian; Mohit N Gilotra; S Ashfaq Hasan; Umasuthan Srikumaran; Samer S Hasan; Frances Cuomo; Robert T Burks; Andrew G Green; Wesley M Nottage; Sai Theja; Hafiz F Kassam; Maarouf A Saad; Miguel A Ramirez; Rodney J Stanley; Matthew D Williams; Vidushan Nadarajah; Alexis C Konja; Jason L Koh; Andrew S Rokito; Charles M Jobin; William N Levine; Christopher C Schmidt
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 6.  Going forward with reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Keshav Singhal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-10-06

7.  Mid- to long-term outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with latissimus dorsi and teres major transfer for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Philippe Valenti; Leila Oryadi Zanjani; Bradley S Schoch; Efi Kazum; Jean David Werthel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  [Cuff tear arthropathy – long-term results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty].

Authors:  U Brunner; K Rückl; M Fruth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  The effect of glenosphere size on functional outcome for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  V J Sabesan; D J Lombardo; R Shahriar; G R Petersen-Fitts; J M Wiater
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-02-09

10.  Does lateralisation of the centre of rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty avoid scapular notching? Clinical and radiological review of one hundred and forty cases with forty five months of follow-up.

Authors:  Denis Katz; Philippe Valenti; Jean Kany; Kamil Elkholti; Jean-David Werthel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.