Literature DB >> 21397423

Analysis of patient dose in full field digital mammography.

Baoying Chen1, Yingmei Wang, Xin Sun, Wei Guo, Ming Zhao, Guangbin Cui, Lina Hu, Pei Li, Yan Ren, Jun Feng, Jun Yu.   

Abstract

Now, full field digital mammography (FFDM) is widely used in diagnosis of breast cancer. With the development of FFDM, the radiation dose delivered to the patients involved in an imaging protocol is of utmost concern. Here, we analyzed the average glandular dose (AGD) and entrance surface exposure (ESE) of 1397 patients (6008 images) who underwent mammographic examinations by FFDM in three modes with automatic optimization of parameters (AOP), namely STD for standard mode, CNT for contrast mode and DOSE for dose mode. In addition, exposure factors including kVp, tube loading (mAs), and target/filter combination were evaluated. As a result, the patient dose was sorted as CNT>STD>DOSE. The dose difference among the three AOP modes was mainly attributed to the selection of mAs. The AGD and breast compressed thickness were well correlated in STD and DOSE modes. However, the correlation between CNT-delivered AGD and breast compressed thickness was dependent on the range of the breast thickness and patient age. The findings on dose and exposure characteristics of the three AOP modes get useful message of patient dose in the acquisition of FFDM.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21397423     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  7 in total

1.  Optimization of Image Quality and Dose in Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Agnes M F Fausto; M C Lopes; M C de Sousa; Tânia A C Furquim; Anderson W Mol; Fermin G Velasco
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  The Effect of Breast Size and Density in Turkish Women on Radiation Dose in Full-Field Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Ayşegül İdil Soylu; Mesut Öztürk; Ahmet Veysel Polat
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2021-10-04

3.  Dosimetry and image quality assessment in a direct radiography system.

Authors:  Bruno Beraldo Oliveira; Marcio Alves de Oliveira; Lucas Paixão; Maria Helena Araújo Teixeira; Maria do Socorro Nogueira
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

4.  Influence of breast compression pressure on the performance of population-based mammography screening.

Authors:  Katharina Holland; Ioannis Sechopoulos; Ritse M Mann; Gerard J den Heeten; Carla H van Gils; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 6.466

5.  Mammographic compression in Asian women.

Authors:  Susie Lau; Yang Faridah Abdul Aziz; Kwan Hoong Ng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Dose reduction in automatic optimization parameter of full field digital mammography: breast phantom study.

Authors:  Myung-Su Ko; Hak Hee Kim; Joo Hee Cha; Hee Jung Shin; Jeoung Hyun Kim; Min Jeong Kim
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 3.588

7.  Effect of anode/filter combination on average glandular dose in mammography.

Authors:  Michał Biegała; Teresa Jakubowska; Karolina Markowska
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.