Literature DB >> 21394555

Timing of reflexive visuospatial orienting in young, young-old, and old-old adults.

Linda K Langley1, Chris Kelland Friesen, Alyson L Saville, Annie T Ciernia.   

Abstract

This study examined adult age differences in reflexive orienting to two types of uninformative spatial cues: central arrows and peripheral onsets. In two experiments using a Posner cuing task, young adults (ages 18-28 years), young-old adults (60-74 years), and old-old adults (75-92 years) responded to targets that were preceded 100-1,000 ms earlier by a central arrow or a peripheral abrupt onset. In Experiment 1, the cue remained present upon target onset. Facilitation effects at short cue-target stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) were prolonged in duration for the two older groups relative to the young adults. At longer cue-target SOAs, inhibition of return (IOR) that was initiated by peripheral onset cues was observed in the performance of young adults but not in that of the two older groups. In Experiment 2, the cue was presented briefly and removed prior to target onset. The change in cue duration minimized age differences (particularly for young-old adults) in facilitation effects and led to IOR for all three age groups. The findings are consistent with the idea that attentional control settings change with age, with higher settings for older adults leading to delayed disengagement from spatial cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21394555      PMCID: PMC3387807          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0108-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  37 in total

Review 1.  Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency.

Authors:  M E Faust; D A Balota; D H Spieler; F R Ferraro
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Inhibition of return in spatial attention: direct evidence for collicular generation.

Authors:  A Sapir; N Soroker; A Berger; A Henik
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Inhibition of return.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Symbolic control of visual attention.

Authors:  B Hommel; J Pratt; L Colzato; R Godijn
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-09

5.  Covert reorienting and inhibition of return: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  Jöran Lepsien; Stefan Pollmann
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; B Milliken; C Solano; B Weaver; S P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-08

7.  Attentional asymmetry in schizophrenia: disengagement and inhibition of return deficits.

Authors:  A Sapir; A Henik; M Dobrusin; E Y Hochman
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

9.  Eye gaze is not unique: automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows.

Authors:  Jason Tipples
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

10.  Effects of aging on visuospatial attention: an ERP study.

Authors:  T Curran; A Hills; M B Patterson; M E Strauss
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  9 in total

1.  Reflexive orienting in response to short- and long-duration gaze cues in young, young-old, and old-old adults.

Authors:  Nora D Gayzur; Linda K Langley; Chris Kelland; Sara V Wyman; Alyson L Saville; Annie T Ciernia; Ganesh Padmanabhan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Effects of spatial, temporal and spatiotemporal cueing are alike when attention is directed voluntarily.

Authors:  Bettina Olk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Enhancing Spatial Attention and Working Memory in Younger and Older Adults.

Authors:  Camarin E Rolle; Joaquin A Anguera; Sasha N Skinner; Bradley Voytek; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Oscillatory dynamics in the dorsal and ventral attention networks during the reorienting of attention.

Authors:  Amy L Proskovec; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Alex I Wiesman; Timothy J McDermott; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Attentional Bias to Beauty with Evolutionary Benefits: Evidence from Aesthetic Appraisal of Landscape Architecture.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Xiaoxiang Tang; Xianyou He; Shuxian Lai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-07

6.  Modulation of attention networks serving reorientation in healthy aging.

Authors:  Yasra Arif; Rachel K Spooner; Alex I Wiesman; Christine M Embury; Amy L Proskovec; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.682

7.  Revealing Dissociable Attention Biases in Chronic Smokers Through an Individual-Differences Approach.

Authors:  Chiara Della Libera; Thomas Zandonai; Lorenzo Zamboni; Elisa Santandrea; Marco Sandri; Fabio Lugoboni; Cristiano Chiamulera; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Altered social cognition in a community sample of women with disordered eating behaviours: a multi-method approach.

Authors:  Devon S Heath; Nimrit Jhinjar; Dana A Hayward
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Overview of (f)MRI Studies of Cognitive Aging for Non-Experts: Looking through the Lens of Neuroimaging.

Authors:  Toshikazu Kawagoe
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.