Literature DB >> 24170377

Reflexive orienting in response to short- and long-duration gaze cues in young, young-old, and old-old adults.

Nora D Gayzur1, Linda K Langley, Chris Kelland, Sara V Wyman, Alyson L Saville, Annie T Ciernia, Ganesh Padmanabhan.   

Abstract

Shifting visual focus on the basis of the perceived gaze direction of another person is one form of joint attention. In the present study, we investigated whether this socially relevant form of orienting is reflexive and whether it is influenced by age. Green and Woldorff (Cognition 122:96-101, 2012) argued that rapid cueing effects (i.e., faster responses to validly than to invalidly cued targets) were limited to conditions in which a cue overlapped in time with a target. They attributed slower responses following invalid cues to the time needed to resolve the incongruent spatial information provided by the concurrently presented cue and target. In the present study, we examined the orienting responses of young (18-31 years), young-old (60-74 years), and old-old (75-91 years) adults following uninformative central gaze cues that overlapped in time with the target (Exp. 1) or that were removed prior to target presentation (Exp. 2). When the cue and target overlapped, all three groups localized validly cued targets more quickly than invalidly cued targets, and validity effects emerged earlier for the two younger groups (at 100 ms post-cue-onset) than for the old-old group (at 300 ms post-cue-onset). With a short-duration cue (Exp. 2), validity effects developed rapidly (by 100 ms) for all three groups, suggesting that validity effects resulted from reflexive orienting based on the gaze cue information rather than from cue-target conflict. Thus, although old-old adults may be slow to disengage from persistent gaze cues, attention continues to be reflexively guided by gaze cues late in life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24170377      PMCID: PMC3981892          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0554-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  40 in total

Review 1.  Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency.

Authors:  M E Faust; D A Balota; D H Spieler; F R Ferraro
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Symbolic control of visual attention.

Authors:  B Hommel; J Pratt; L Colzato; R Godijn
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-09

3.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

4.  Aging and shifts of visual spatial attention.

Authors:  C L Folk; W J Hoyer
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1992-09

5.  Eye gaze is not unique: automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows.

Authors:  Jason Tipples
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

6.  The eyes have it!: an fMRI investigation.

Authors:  Alan Kingstone; Christine Tipper; Jelena Ristic; Elton Ngan
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Attentional effects of counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues.

Authors:  Chris Kelland Friesen; Jelena Ristic; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Are eyes special? It depends on how you look at it.

Authors:  Jelena Ristic; Chris Kelland Friesen; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

9.  Adult age differences in the time course of inhibition of return.

Authors:  Alan D Castel; Alison L Chasteen; Charles T Scialfa; Jay Pratt
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  Covert and overt orienting to gaze direction cues and the effects of fixation offset.

Authors:  Chris Kelland Friesen; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-03-03       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  5 in total

1.  Poor vigilance affects attentional orienting triggered by central uninformative gaze and arrow cues.

Authors:  Andrea Marotta; Diana Martella; Lisa Maccari; Mara Sebastiani; Maria Casagrande
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-04-10

2.  Lifestyle Matters: Effects of Habitual Physical Activity on Driving Skills in Older Age.

Authors:  Evrim Gökçe; Robert Stojan; Melanie Mack; Otmar Bock; Claudia Voelcker-Rehage
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-06

3.  Investigating Discontinuity of Age Relations in Cognitive Functioning, General Health Status, Activity Participation, and Life Satisfaction between Young-Old and Old-Old Age.

Authors:  Andreas Ihle; Daniela S Jopp; Michel Oris; Delphine Fagot; Matthias Kliegel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Is Inhibition of Return Modulated by Involuntary Orienting of Spatial Attention: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Fada Pan; Xiaogang Wu; Li Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-31

5.  How Does Aging Affect Social Attention? A Test of Competing Theories Using Multilevel Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kate T McKay; Louisa A Talipski; Sarah A Grainger; Manikya Alister; Julie D Henry
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.942

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.