Literature DB >> 21389056

Disruption of a conserved region of Xist exon 1 impairs Xist RNA localisation and X-linked gene silencing during random and imprinted X chromosome inactivation.

Claire E Senner1, Tatyana B Nesterova, Sara Norton, Hamlata Dewchand, Jonathan Godwin, Winifred Mak, Neil Brockdorff.   

Abstract

In XX female mammals a single X chromosome is inactivated early in embryonic development, a process that is required to equalise X-linked gene dosage relative to XY males. X inactivation is regulated by a cis-acting master switch, the Xist locus, the product of which is a large non-coding RNA that coats the chromosome from which it is transcribed, triggering recruitment of chromatin modifying factors that establish and maintain gene silencing chromosome wide. Chromosome coating and Xist RNA-mediated silencing remain poorly understood, both at the level of RNA sequence determinants and interacting factors. Here, we describe analysis of a novel targeted mutation, Xist(INV), designed to test the function of a conserved region located in exon 1 of Xist RNA during X inactivation in mouse. We show that Xist(INV) is a strong hypomorphic allele that is appropriately regulated but compromised in its ability to silence X-linked loci in cis. Inheritance of Xist(INV) on the paternal X chromosome results in embryonic lethality due to failure of imprinted X inactivation in extra-embryonic lineages. Female embryos inheriting Xist(INV) on the maternal X chromosome undergo extreme secondary non-random X inactivation, eliminating the majority of cells that express the Xist(INV) allele. Analysis of cells that express Xist(INV) RNA demonstrates reduced association of the mutant RNA to the X chromosome, suggesting that conserved sequences in the inverted region are important for Xist RNA localisation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21389056      PMCID: PMC3062423          DOI: 10.1242/dev.056812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  47 in total

1.  Chromosomal silencing and localization are mediated by different domains of Xist RNA.

Authors:  Anton Wutz; Theodore P Rasmussen; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Histone H3 lysine 9 methylation is an epigenetic imprint of facultative heterochromatin.

Authors:  Antoine H F M Peters; Jacqueline E Mermoud; Dónal O'Carroll; Michaela Pagani; Dieter Schweizer; Neil Brockdorff; Thomas Jenuwein
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-12-10       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Establishment of histone h3 methylation on the inactive X chromosome requires transient recruitment of Eed-Enx1 polycomb group complexes.

Authors:  Jose Silva; Winifred Mak; Ilona Zvetkova; Ruth Appanah; Tatyana B Nesterova; Zoe Webster; Antoine H F M Peters; Thomas Jenuwein; Arie P Otte; Neil Brockdorff
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.270

4.  Epigenetic dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during early mouse development.

Authors:  Ikuhiro Okamoto; Arie P Otte; C David Allis; Danny Reinberg; Edith Heard
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Reactivation of the paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos.

Authors:  Winifred Mak; Tatyana B Nesterova; Mariana de Napoles; Ruth Appanah; Shinya Yamanaka; Arie P Otte; Neil Brockdorff
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A proximal conserved repeat in the Xist gene is essential as a genomic element for X-inactivation in mouse.

Authors:  Yuko Hoki; Naomi Kimura; Minako Kanbayashi; Yuko Amakawa; Tatsuya Ohhata; Hiroyuki Sasaki; Takashi Sado
Journal:  Development       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 6.868

7.  Histone H3 lysine 9 methylation occurs rapidly at the onset of random X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Jacqueline E Mermoud; Bilyana Popova; Antoine H F M Peters; Thomas Jenuwein; Neil Brockdorff
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-02-05       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Imprinting and X chromosome counting mechanisms determine Xist expression in early mouse development.

Authors:  G F Kay; S C Barton; M A Surani; S Rastan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-06-03       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Skewing X chromosome choice by modulating sense transcription across the Xist locus.

Authors:  Tatyana B Nesterova; Colette M Johnston; Ruth Appanah; Alistair E T Newall; Jonathan Godwin; Maria Alexiou; Neil Brockdorff
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Quantitative RT-PCR assays show Xist RNA levels are low in mouse female adult tissue, embryos and embryoid bodies.

Authors:  C H Buzin; J R Mann; J Singer-Sam
Journal:  Development       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Epigenesis and plasticity of mouse trophoblast stem cells.

Authors:  Julie Prudhomme; Céline Morey
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  RNA-sequencing from single nuclei.

Authors:  Rashel V Grindberg; Joyclyn L Yee-Greenbaum; Michael J McConnell; Mark Novotny; Andy L O'Shaughnessy; Georgina M Lambert; Marcos J Araúzo-Bravo; Jun Lee; Max Fishman; Gillian E Robbins; Xiaoying Lin; Pratap Venepally; Jonathan H Badger; David W Galbraith; Fred H Gage; Roger S Lasken
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  SHAPE reveals transcript-wide interactions, complex structural domains, and protein interactions across the Xist lncRNA in living cells.

Authors:  Matthew J Smola; Thomas W Christy; Kaoru Inoue; Cindo O Nicholson; Matthew Friedersdorf; Jack D Keene; David M Lee; J Mauro Calabrese; Kevin M Weeks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  X-inactivation and X-reactivation: epigenetic hallmarks of mammalian reproduction and pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Bernhard Payer; Jeannie T Lee; Satoshi H Namekawa
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  A scaffold for X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Anna Tattermusch; Neil Brockdorff
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  Advances in understanding chromosome silencing by the long non-coding RNA Xist.

Authors:  Takashi Sado; Neil Brockdorff
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  The Xist lncRNA exploits three-dimensional genome architecture to spread across the X chromosome.

Authors:  Jesse M Engreitz; Amy Pandya-Jones; Patrick McDonel; Alexander Shishkin; Klara Sirokman; Christine Surka; Sabah Kadri; Jeffrey Xing; Alon Goren; Eric S Lander; Kathrin Plath; Mitchell Guttman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Impaired imprinted X chromosome inactivation is responsible for the skewed sex ratio following in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Kun Tan; Lei An; Kai Miao; Likun Ren; Zhuocheng Hou; Li Tao; Zhenni Zhang; Xiaodong Wang; Wei Xia; Jinghao Liu; Zhuqing Wang; Guangyin Xi; Shuai Gao; Linlin Sui; De-Sheng Zhu; Shumin Wang; Zhonghong Wu; Ingolf Bach; Dong-Bao Chen; Jianhui Tian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  ArcRNAs and the formation of nuclear bodies.

Authors:  Shinichi Nakagawa; Tomohiro Yamazaki; Taro Mannen; Tetsuro Hirose
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.957

10.  Decapping enzyme 1A breaks X-chromosome symmetry by controlling Tsix elongation and RNA turnover.

Authors:  Hun-Goo Lee; Yong-Woo Lee; Eric Aeby; Andrea Kriz; Brian C Del Rosario; Hyun Jung Oh; Myriam Boukhali; Wilhelm Haas; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 28.824

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.