Kimberly A Mallett1, Miesha Marzell, Rob Turrisi. 1. Prevention Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, 204 East Calder Way, State College, PA 16801, USA. kmallett@psu.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Pre-college drinking has been shown to be a predictor of risky drinking and harmful outcomes in college. By contrast, less is known about how pre-college alcohol consequences influence subsequent consequences during the freshman year. The present study examined pre-college drinking and consequences in relationship to consequences experienced during the freshman year to better understand alcohol-related problems in this population. METHOD: Incoming freshmen (N = 340, 58% female) were randomly selected and completed measures of drinking quantity, alcohol-related consequences, and drinking style behaviors at pre-college baseline and at 10-month follow-up. RESULTS: Pre-college consequences demonstrated a unique relationship with consequences at 10-month follow-up controlling for both pre-college and freshman-year alcohol consumption. Furthermore, precollege consequences moderated the relationship between pre-college drinking and consequences at 10-month follow-up. For individuals who reported above-average pre-college consequences, no differences in 10-month follow-up consequences were observed across different levels of drinking. Finally, drinking style significantly mediated the relationship between the interaction between pre-college drinking and consequences and consequences at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrate the need to identify students who are at an increased risk of experiencing alcohol-related problems during their freshman year based on their history of consequences before college. Interventions aimed at these students may benefit from examining the usefulness of increasing protective behaviors as a method to reduce consequences in addition to reducing drinking quantity.
OBJECTIVE: Pre-college drinking has been shown to be a predictor of risky drinking and harmful outcomes in college. By contrast, less is known about how pre-college alcohol consequences influence subsequent consequences during the freshman year. The present study examined pre-college drinking and consequences in relationship to consequences experienced during the freshman year to better understand alcohol-related problems in this population. METHOD: Incoming freshmen (N = 340, 58% female) were randomly selected and completed measures of drinking quantity, alcohol-related consequences, and drinking style behaviors at pre-college baseline and at 10-month follow-up. RESULTS: Pre-college consequences demonstrated a unique relationship with consequences at 10-month follow-up controlling for both pre-college and freshman-year alcohol consumption. Furthermore, precollege consequences moderated the relationship between pre-college drinking and consequences at 10-month follow-up. For individuals who reported above-average pre-college consequences, no differences in 10-month follow-up consequences were observed across different levels of drinking. Finally, drinking style significantly mediated the relationship between the interaction between pre-college drinking and consequences and consequences at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrate the need to identify students who are at an increased risk of experiencing alcohol-related problems during their freshman year based on their history of consequences before college. Interventions aimed at these students may benefit from examining the usefulness of increasing protective behaviors as a method to reduce consequences in addition to reducing drinking quantity.
Authors: Kimberly A Mallett; Anne E Ray; Rob Turrisi; Calum Belden; Rachel L Bachrach; Mary E Larimer Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Rob Turrisi; Mary E Larimer; Kimberly A Mallett; Jason R Kilmer; Anne E Ray; Nadine R Mastroleo; Irene Markman Geisner; Joel Grossbard; Sean Tollison; Ty W Lostutter; Heidi Montoya Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Kimberly A Mallett; Lindsey Varvil-Weld; Brian Borsari; Jennifer P Read; Clayton Neighbors; Helene R White Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2012-12-14 Impact factor: 3.455