Literature DB >> 35150299

The use of 14/16Fr ureter access sheath for safe and effective management of large upper ureteral calculi.

Arman Tsaturyan1, George Kalogeropoulos2, Marco Lattarulo2, Constantinos Adamou2, Konstantinos Pagonis2, Angelis Peteinaris2, Despoina Liourdi2, Theofanis Vrettos3, Evangelos Liatsikos2,4,5, Panagiotis Kallidonis2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of ureteroscopic lithotripsy for the management of large proximal ureteral stones > 10 mm using 14/16 Fr ureteral access sheath (UAS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients' data from prospective database undergoing ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy with a use of 14/16Fr UAS were collected. All patients were pre-stented prior to the procedure. The fragmentation was performed with a semi-rigid ureteroscope using holmium laser energy with a power setting of 35 W (frequency-35 Hz; energy-1 J). Follow-up was scheduled at 4 weeks and 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: In total 78 patients, 43 males and 35 females, were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 59.5 ± 13.3 with a mean maximal stone diameter of 13.4 ± 2.1. The mean operative time was 35.7 ± 9.7 and the mean hospital stay was 2 ± 0.7 days. The primary SFR at 4 weeks was 73 patients (93.6%), while all 78 patients (100%) were stone free at 3-month follow-up, 2 of the patients receiving additional treatment. In total, 8 (10.2%) patients experienced Grade II complications. Intraoperative ureteral lesions were observed in 41 (52.6%) cases. Out of them 31 patients (39.7%) developed Grade 1, 8 patients (10.3%) Grade 2 and only 3 patients (2.6%) Grade 3 lesions.
CONCLUSION: The use of 14/16Fr ureteral access sheath on pre-stented patients was associated with successful outcomes. A high stone-free rate of 93.6% was achieved at 4-week follow-up. The procedure was not associated with increased rate of postoperative complications and intraoperative ureteral injury.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High-power laser; Ureteral access sheath; Ureteral stone; Ureterorenoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35150299     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-03949-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  28 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary management of ureteral stones.

Authors:  Markus J Bader; Brian Eisner; Francesco Porpiglia; Glen M Preminger; Hans-Goran Tiselius
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  Medical therapy to facilitate urinary stone passage: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  John M Hollingsworth; Mary A M Rogers; Samuel R Kaufman; Timothy J Bradford; Sanjay Saint; John T Wei; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatment and outcomes for distal, mid-, proximal, or multiple ureteral locations: the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society ureteroscopy global study.

Authors:  Enrique Perez Castro; Palle J S Osther; Viorel Jinga; Hassan Razvi; Konstantinos G Stravodimos; Kandarp Parikh; Ali R Kural; Jean J de la Rosette
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Authors:  Olivier Traxer; Alexandre Thomas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Clavien classification of semirigid ureteroscopy complications: a prospective study.

Authors:  Swarnendu Mandal; Apul Goel; Manish Kumar Singh; Rohit Kathpalia; Deepak S Nagathan; Satya N Sankhwar; Vishwajeet Singh; Bhupender P Singh; Rahul J Sinha; Divakar Dalela
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Increasing the size of ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery improves surgical efficiency without increasing complications.

Authors:  Chad R Tracy; George M Ghareeb; Charles J Paul; Nathan A Brooks
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Assessment of stricture formation with the ureteral access sheath.

Authors:  Fernando C Delvecchio; Brian K Auge; Ricardo M Brizuela; Alon Z Weizer; Ari D Silverstein; Costas D Lallas; Paul K Pietrow; David M Albala; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Is it safe to use a ureteral access sheath in an unstented ureter?

Authors:  Asaf Shvero; Haim Herzberg; Dorit Zilberman; Yoram Mor; Harry Winkler; Nir Kleinmann
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Impact of ureteral access sheath on renal stone treatment: prospective comparative non-randomised outcomes over a 7-year period.

Authors:  Ashleigh Lima; Thomas Reeves; Robert Geraghty; Amelia Pietropaolo; Lily Whitehurst; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Surgical management of urolithiasis - a systematic analysis of available guidelines.

Authors:  Valentin Zumstein; Patrick Betschart; Dominik Abt; Hans-Peter Schmid; Cedric Michael Panje; Paul Martin Putora
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.264

View more
  1 in total

1.  Identification of the Risk Factors for the Failure of Ureteral Access Sheath Placement.

Authors:  Jieping Hu; Yue Yu; Wei Liu; Jialei Zhong; Xiaochen Zhou; Haibo Xi
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 3.149

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.