Literature DB >> 21388199

Computational design of the sequence and structure of a protein-binding peptide.

Deanne W Sammond1, Dustin E Bosch, Glenn L Butterfoss, Carrie Purbeck, Mischa Machius, David P Siderovski, Brian Kuhlman.   

Abstract

The de novo design of protein-binding peptides is challenging because it requires the identification of both a sequence and a backbone conformation favorable for binding. We used a computational strategy that iterates between structure and sequence optimization to redesign the C-terminal portion of the RGS14 GoLoco motif peptide so that it adopts a new conformation when bound to Gα(i1). An X-ray crystal structure of the redesigned complex closely matches the computational model, with a backbone root-mean-square deviation of 1.1 Å.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21388199      PMCID: PMC3081598          DOI: 10.1021/ja110296z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  22 in total

1.  Structural determinants for GoLoco-induced inhibition of nucleotide release by Galpha subunits.

Authors:  Randall J Kimple; Michelle E Kimple; Laurie Betts; John Sondek; David P Siderovski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Recapitulation and design of protein binding peptide structures and sequences.

Authors:  Vanita D Sood; David Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Structure-based protocol for identifying mutations that enhance protein-protein binding affinities.

Authors:  Deanne W Sammond; Ziad M Eletr; Carrie Purbeck; Randall J Kimple; David P Siderovski; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Modeling backbone flexibility to achieve sequence diversity: the design of novel alpha-helical ligands for Bcl-xL.

Authors:  Xiaoran Fu; James R Apgar; Amy E Keating
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  Progress in computational protein design.

Authors:  Shaun M Lippow; Bruce Tidor
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 7.  Protein design in biological networks: from manipulating the input to modifying the output.

Authors:  Almer M Van der Sloot; Christina Kiel; Luis Serrano; Francois Stricher
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 1.650

Review 8.  Macromolecular modeling with rosetta.

Authors:  Rhiju Das; David Baker
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 9.  Computer-aided design of functional protein interactions.

Authors:  Daniel J Mandell; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 15.040

10.  Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions.

Authors:  K T Simons; C Kooperberg; E Huang; D Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-04-25       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  17 in total

1.  Computational design of a symmetric homodimer using β-strand assembly.

Authors:  P Benjamin Stranges; Mischa Machius; Michael J Miley; Ashutosh Tripathy; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Computational design and experimental verification of a symmetric protein homodimer.

Authors:  Yun Mou; Po-Ssu Huang; Fang-Ciao Hsu; Shing-Jong Huang; Stephen L Mayo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A comparison of successful and failed protein interface designs highlights the challenges of designing buried hydrogen bonds.

Authors:  P Benjamin Stranges; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Structure-based redesign of proteins for minimal T-cell epitope content.

Authors:  Yoonjoo Choi; Karl E Griswold; Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Increasing sequence diversity with flexible backbone protein design: the complete redesign of a protein hydrophobic core.

Authors:  Grant S Murphy; Jeffrey L Mills; Michael J Miley; Mischa Machius; Thomas Szyperski; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Metal-mediated affinity and orientation specificity in a computationally designed protein homodimer.

Authors:  Bryan S Der; Mischa Machius; Michael J Miley; Jeffrey L Mills; Thomas Szyperski; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Rosetta and the Design of Ligand Binding Sites.

Authors:  Rocco Moretti; Brian J Bender; Brittany Allison; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2016

8.  Combined computational design of a zinc-binding site and a protein-protein interaction: one open zinc coordination site was not a robust hotspot for de novo ubiquitin binding.

Authors:  Bryan S Der; Ramesh K Jha; Raamesh K Jha; Steven M Lewis; Peter M Thompson; Gurkan Guntas; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-04-20

Review 9.  Strategies to control the binding mode of de novo designed protein interactions.

Authors:  Bryan S Der; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 6.809

10.  Crystal structures of the scaffolding protein LGN reveal the general mechanism by which GoLoco binding motifs inhibit the release of GDP from Gαi.

Authors:  Min Jia; Jianchao Li; Jinwei Zhu; Wenyu Wen; Mingjie Zhang; Wenning Wang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.