Literature DB >> 17603074

Structure-based protocol for identifying mutations that enhance protein-protein binding affinities.

Deanne W Sammond1, Ziad M Eletr, Carrie Purbeck, Randall J Kimple, David P Siderovski, Brian Kuhlman.   

Abstract

The ability to manipulate protein binding affinities is important for the development of proteins as biosensors, industrial reagents, and therapeutics. We have developed a structure-based method to rationally predict single mutations at protein-protein interfaces that enhance binding affinities. The protocol is based on the premise that increasing buried hydrophobic surface area and/or reducing buried hydrophilic surface area will generally lead to enhanced affinity if large steric clashes are not introduced and buried polar groups are not left without a hydrogen bond partner. The procedure selects affinity enhancing point mutations at the protein-protein interface using three criteria: (1) the mutation must be from a polar amino acid to a non-polar amino acid or from a non-polar amino acid to a larger non-polar amino acid, (2) the free energy of binding as calculated with the Rosetta protein modeling program should be more favorable than the free energy of binding calculated for the wild-type complex and (3) the mutation should not be predicted to significantly destabilize the monomers. The performance of the computational protocol was experimentally tested on two separate protein complexes; Galpha(i1) from the heterotrimeric G-protein system bound to the RGS14 GoLoco motif, and the E2, UbcH7, bound to the E3, E6AP from the ubiquitin pathway. Twelve single-site mutations that were predicted to be stabilizing were synthesized and characterized in the laboratory. Nine of the 12 mutations successfully increased binding affinity with five of these increasing binding by over 1.0 kcal/mol. To further assess our approach we searched the literature for point mutations that pass our criteria and have experimentally determined binding affinities. Of the eight mutations identified, five were accurately predicted to increase binding affinity, further validating the method as a useful tool to increase protein-protein binding affinities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17603074      PMCID: PMC2682327          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  49 in total

1.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Automated design of specificity in molecular recognition.

Authors:  James J Havranek; Pehr B Harbury
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2003-01

3.  Redesigning an antibody fragment for faster association with its antigen.

Authors:  Jonathan S Marvin; Henry B Lowman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Electrostatically optimized Ras-binding Ral guanine dissociation stimulator mutants increase the rate of association by stabilizing the encounter complex.

Authors:  C Kiel; T Selzer; Y Shaul; G Schreiber; C Herrmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Computational design of a biologically active enzyme.

Authors:  Mary A Dwyer; Loren L Looger; Homme W Hellinga
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-25       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Integrating cell-level kinetic modeling into the design of engineered protein therapeutics.

Authors:  Balaji M Rao; Douglas A Lauffenburger; K Dane Wittrup
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Affinity enhancement of an in vivo matured therapeutic antibody using structure-based computational design.

Authors:  Louis A Clark; P Ann Boriack-Sjodin; John Eldredge; Christopher Fitch; Bethany Friedman; Karl J M Hanf; Matthew Jarpe; Stefano F Liparoto; You Li; Alexey Lugovskoy; Stephan Miller; Mia Rushe; Woody Sherman; Kenneth Simon; Herman Van Vlijmen
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 8.  Hydrogen bonding in globular proteins.

Authors:  E N Baker; R E Hubbard
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.667

9.  Structure of an E6AP-UbcH7 complex: insights into ubiquitination by the E2-E3 enzyme cascade.

Authors:  L Huang; E Kinnucan; G Wang; S Beaudenon; P M Howley; J M Huibregtse; N P Pavletich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-11-12       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Rational design of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) variants for antagonizing integrin lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1-dependent adhesion.

Authors:  Gang Song; Greg A Lazar; Tanja Kortemme; Motomu Shimaoka; John R Desjarlais; David Baker; Timothy A Springer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  52 in total

1.  Combining different design strategies for rational affinity maturation of the MICA-NKG2D interface.

Authors:  Samuel H Henager; Melissa A Hale; Nicholas J Maurice; Erin C Dunnington; Carter J Swanson; Megan J Peterson; Joseph J Ban; David J Culpepper; Luke D Davies; Lisa K Sanders; Benjamin J McFarland
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Structural determinants of affinity enhancement between GoLoco motifs and G-protein alpha subunit mutants.

Authors:  Dustin E Bosch; Adam J Kimple; Deanne W Sammond; Robin E Muller; Michael J Miley; Mischa Machius; Brian Kuhlman; Francis S Willard; David P Siderovski
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Identification of interacting hot spots in the beta3 integrin stalk using comprehensive interface design.

Authors:  Jason E Donald; Hua Zhu; Rustem I Litvinov; William F DeGrado; Joel S Bennett
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  A point mutation to Galphai selectively blocks GoLoco motif binding: direct evidence for Galpha.GoLoco complexes in mitotic spindle dynamics.

Authors:  Francis S Willard; Zhen Zheng; Juan Guo; Gregory J Digby; Adam J Kimple; Jason M Conley; Christopher A Johnston; Dustin Bosch; Melinda D Willard; Val J Watts; Nevin A Lambert; Stephen R Ikeda; Quansheng Du; David P Siderovski
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Designing specific protein-protein interactions using computation, experimental library screening, or integrated methods.

Authors:  T Scott Chen; Amy E Keating
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Flex ddG: Rosetta Ensemble-Based Estimation of Changes in Protein-Protein Binding Affinity upon Mutation.

Authors:  Kyle A Barlow; Shane Ó Conchúir; Samuel Thompson; Pooja Suresh; James E Lucas; Markus Heinonen; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  The protein-protein interface evolution acts in a similar way to antibody affinity maturation.

Authors:  Bohua Li; Lei Zhao; Chong Wang; Huaizu Guo; Lan Wu; Xunming Zhang; Weizhu Qian; Hao Wang; Yajun Guo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Computer-aided design of functional protein interactions.

Authors:  Daniel J Mandell; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 15.040

9.  Development of inhibitors of heterotrimeric Gαi subunits.

Authors:  Kathryn M Appleton; Kevin J Bigham; Christopher C Lindsey; Starr Hazard; Jonel Lirjoni; Stuart Parnham; Mirko Hennig; Yuri K Peterson
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Identification of structural mechanisms of HIV-1 protease specificity using computational peptide docking: implications for drug resistance.

Authors:  Sidhartha Chaudhury; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 5.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.